3rd Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit has appellate jurisdiction over several US states including: The District of Delaware, District of New Jersey, and the Districts of Eastern/Western/Middle Pennsylvania. The Third Circuit also manifests its jurisdictional power over the US Virgin Islands.

Unlike the 12-other circuit courts in the United States, the Third Circuit was created under the IV Amendment rather than the III, which the other courts were created under. There are a total of 11 courthouses in the Third Circuit. The main courthouse, for the Third Circuit is James A. Byrne United States Courthouse in Philadelphia, PA. The US District Court for Delaware is in Wilmington. The Eastern District of New Jersey is in Newark. In Pennsylvania, the Eastern District is in Philadelphia, Middle District in Scranton, and Western District sits in Pittsburgh. The District for the US Virgin Islands is in Charlotte Amalie, USVI.

The Third Circuit is highly influential in setting precedent and hearing cases which deal with major corporations. More than half of the major companies in the United States are incorporated in Delaware. Because of this lawsuit dealing with such corporations are typically heard by the District Court in the State. Cases where a state court lacks personal jurisdiction over individuals initiating a lawsuit typically go through the Circuit Courts.  

There are currently 14 active judges appointed under the Third Circuit and 11 senior judges. David Brooks Smith is the chief judge of the Third Circuit.

Several cases have been heard by the Third Circuit, a recent decision Piscataway School Board v Taxman (1996) was a case which dealt with racial-diversity. The ruling served as precedent for future Section VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 cases. This is just one of the many cases which has set judicial precedent for future cases in the District.  

The National Law Review covers litigation between major corporations and individual petitioners, bankruptcy proceedings, stockholder and derivative actions, appeals to the tax court, and bankruptcy petitions. Cases arising from Constitutional rights, federal duties, and cases which don’t fall under individual state courts’ jurisdiction are also highly covered on the website.

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Jul
22
2021
A New Strain of COVID-19 Shareholder Suit Proskauer Rose LLP
Jan
30
2011
A Peer Review Reminder to Take Caution with Documentation von Briesen & Roper, s.c.
Feb
19
2016
A Practice in Legal Fundamentals: Third Circuit Court Tells NLRB to Apply the Correct Legal Test Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
5
2023
A Remittance to the IRS May Not Always Operate as Intended Miller Canfield
Oct
29
2019
A Review of Recent Whistleblower Developments: October 29, 2019 Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
4
2023
A Royal Pain: Contingent Royalties Held to be Dischargeable in Mallinckrodt Bracewell LLP
Jan
29
2018
A Shot in the Arm for Employer Vaccine Requirements for Health Care Workers Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Jun
30
2022
A Sign of the Times: Policyholder Forced to Sue Insurers to Resume Payment of Defense Costs Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
23
2021
A Third Federal Court Orders Production of Data Incident Forensic Report and Related Communications Over Privilege Objections Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
20
2017
A Tie Too Far: Antitrust Class Action Alleging Physician Association Tied Board Certification to Association Membership Survives Motion to Dismiss Mintz
Mar
2
2018
A Vibration Dampener Fails Mayo/Alice Test in D. Delaware – Is the Decision as Shaky as it Seems? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
19
2021
A Win and a Loss (but Mostly a Win!) Court Grants Motion to Dismiss on Vicarious Liability Theory [PODCAST] Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
15
2022
A Window into Trade Secret Damages: R&D Costs Can Quantify Unjust Enrichment McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
21
2015
A Yarn Spun, But Advertising Not Tailored to a Lanham Act Claim Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
24
2021
A “Significant Age Difference” Will Suffice to Advance an Age Discrimination Claim Stark & Stark
Aug
11
2022
ACTS Retirement Services Faces Class Action over Data Breach Robinson & Cole LLP
Apr
21
2016
ADA: Are You Participating in the Interactive Process in "Good Faith"? Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Aug
11
2022
Additional-Insured Endorsements Might Not Protect You, Despite what Your Contract and Certificate of Insurance Both Say Strassburger McKenna Gutnick & Gefsky
Jun
5
2014
Aetna Terminates Its Proposed "Ingenix" Class Action Settlement Dickinson Wright PLLC
Nov
18
2019
After-Effects of In re Asacol: Recent District Court Decisions on Certification and Uninjured Class Members Pierce Atwood LLP
Jan
17
2017
Age Discrimination in Employment Act: 50 Really Is the New 40 Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Nov
3
2014
Agricultural Cooperative Antitrust Litigation Continues to Mushroom Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
16
2023
AI Versus Westlaw Copyright Bellwether Hurtles Toward Jury as Summary Judgment Largely Denied Vedder Price
Feb
3
2020
All in the Corporate Family: Attorney-Client Privilege Applies Between Parent and Subsidiaries Faegre Drinker
Sep
26
2012
Alleged Fraudulent Indcument + Unambiguous Contract = Defense Summary Judgment Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Apr
30
2015
Alleged Victim of Sex Discrimination Recovers $13 Million Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Sep
25
2015
Amgen At It Again – Sues Hospira For Not Wanting To Dance Over Biosimilar Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
10
2022
An Emerging Split on the Applicability of the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine Under the DTSA Mintz
Jul
16
2013
An Ivy League Brand: Trademark Infringement in Academia Mintz
Sep
3
2018
An Unlikely Pair: Two New Decisions Allow Consumers to Unilaterally Revoke Written TCPA Consent But for Vastly Different Reasons Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
7
2020
And the Survey Said? No Advertisement Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
21
2019
ANDA Applicant Dismissed for Lack of Venue Under § 1400(b) as District of New Jersey Departs from its own and the District of Delaware’s Prior Rulings Mintz
Nov
6
2020
Anheuser-Busch Not Liable for False Advertising for Pointing Out to Consumers that Miller Lite and Coors Light Use “Corn Syrup” Stark & Stark
Jul
28
2021
Another Court Deems Forensic Investigation Report Neither Privileged Nor Work Product Protected Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
30
2021
Another Court Orders Production of Cybersecurity Firm’s Forensic Report in a Data Breach Case Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins