9th Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, is the largest, with 29 judgeships presently hearing cases on the Bench. The Circuit was created out of the  Evarts Act of 1891, which initially established nine circuit court of appeals. Situated in the Western United States, the United States Court of Appeals is located in San Francisco, CA, at the James R. Browning US Court of Appeals Building.

There are nine states in the Ninth Circuit, and the District of Guam and District of Northern Mariana Islands also fall into the District’s jurisdiction. The Court of Appeals is in San Francisco. The District of Alaska courthouse is in Anchorage. The District of Arizona courthouse is in Phoenix. The Central District of California is in LA, Eastern District in Sacramento, and Southern District in San Diego, CA. The District of Guam courthouse is in Agana, and District of Hawaii is in Honolulu. The District of Idaho courthouse is in Boise, and District of Montana courthouse is in Billings. The District of Nevada courthouse is in Las Vegas, and District of Northern Mariana Islands courthouse in Saipan. The District of Oregon courthouse is in Portland. In the District of Washington, the Eastern District is in Spokane and Western District in Seattle, WA.

Being that it is the largest of the 13-circuits, the Ninth Circuit has 29 appointed judgeships currently sitting on the bench. This is alongside the 16 judges who are senior appointed judges. The Chief Judge for the circuit is Sidney Runyan Thomas, and the Circuit Justice is Anthony Kennedy, who is currently a US Supreme Court Justice.

Being the largest circuit in the country, several important decisions have come out of the Ninth Circuit. Mendez et. al v Westminister School District of Orange County, et al. (1947) is one of those cases. With the court sitting, en banc, the holding that Mexican-American students being placed in separate schools from those attended by a majority of the population was unconstitutional. In GlaxoSmithKline v Abbot Laboratories (2014) the court held that dismissal of jurors over sexual orientation would be barred in future cases.

The National Law Review covers similar cases as those detailed above and other types of case law. With Marijuana legalization being a hot-ticket item, several decisions have recently come in through the Ninth Circuit. Additionally, NLRB cases, employment rights, government elections and legislation, bankruptcy proceedings, and cases involving Major Corporations, have come through the Circuit. The National Law Review offers a wide range of cases in these categories, as well as news, appointments, and general information about the Ninth Circuit court system.

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
Sep
7
2021
Uncertainty Over ‘Waters of the U.S.’ Definition Continues, as Federal Court in Arizona Vacates 2020 Rule Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
17
2017
Uncertainty on Overtime Salary Threshold — Certainly Plenty of Ways to Mess Up Steptoe & Johnson PLLC
Nov
6
2018
Unanimous Supreme Court: ADEA Applies to All State Employers, Regardless of Size Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
2
2020
Unambiguous Repair Clause Bars Coverage for Yacht Fire Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
15
2009
UMG v. Augusto: Allowing the Sale of Promotional CDs Under the First Sale Doctrine Could Affect Much More than the Music Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
5
2024
Ultragenyx to Pay $6 Million To Settle False Claims Act Case ArentFox Schiff LLP
Aug
1
2016
Ultimate Armwrestling League Flexes Its Legal Muscles over Use of Copyrighted Photo Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
22
2016
Uber’s $100 Million Class Action Settlement Gets Wrecked Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
10
2016
Uber-Frustrating: Tips to Facilitate Approval of Settlements of Class Actions Jackson Lewis P.C.
Feb
2
2016
Uber-Complicated: Insurance Gaps for Rideshare Vehicles Can Create Uncertainty for Passengers and Drivers Gilbert LLP
Mar
20
2015
Uber, Lyft Decisions Highlight Difficulty of Classifying Workers in the Modern Economy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
4
2019
Uber Wins a Trip to Arbitration Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Aug
21
2015
Uber Ordered to Buckle Up for Litigation: Taxicab Plaintiffs Ride out (in part) Uber’s Motion to Dismiss False Advertising Claims Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
2
2015
Uber Drivers Win Class Certification in Closely Watched Misclassification Case Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Dec
22
2015
Uber Class Action Update: Court Finds Arbitration Agreement Unenforceable and Broadens Class of Drivers Mintz
Dec
31
2019
Uber and Postmates File Lawsuit Challenging California’s New Independent Contractor Law (AB-5) Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
12
2015
Uber and Lyft Drivers: Employees, Independent Contractors, or Something Else Entirely? Mintz
May
11
2020
U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team’s Equal Pay Act Claim Dismissed, But Other Gender-Based Claims Remain (US) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
12
2019
U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team wins class certification in Equal Pay fight Zuckerman Law
Dec
3
2020
U.S. Women’s National Soccer Team Settles Some Claims in Equal Pay Lawsuit Jackson Lewis P.C.
Sep
26
2014
U.S. Supreme Court’s Rejection of Moench Presumption: Fifth Third Bancorp. vs. Dudenhoeffer Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
9
2023
U.S. Supreme Court Vacates Dog Toy Company’s Win in Jack Daniel’s Parody Trademark Dispute K&L Gates
Jun
17
2019
U.S. Supreme Court Unanimous: No Access to California Wage-and-Hour Laws for OCS Platform Worker Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Jan
18
2024
U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Whether Title VII Protects Employees Contending Discriminatory Transfer Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
27
2012
U.S. Supreme Court to Hear Arguments in Case that Could Have Significant Impact on Strategies Available to Defend FLSA Collective Actions Faegre Drinker
Jun
28
2022
U.S. Supreme Court To Determine Authority, Review Standard For Government Dismissals Of False Claims Act Qui Tam Actions Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
24
2022
U.S. Supreme Court to Clarify Scope of Attorney-Client Privilege Issue Jackson Lewis P.C.
Dec
11
2014
U.S. Supreme Court Rules that Security Screening Time is Non-Compensable Under Federal Law and The Portal-to-Portal Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
29
2023
U.S. Supreme Court Rules in Favor of Arbitration Potentially Altering Legal Strategies for Wide Range of Cases Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
15
2022
U.S. Supreme Court Reverses Ninth Circuit, Holding that a Mistake of Law Can Excuse an Inaccurate Copyright Registration Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Jul
24
2020
U.S. Supreme Court Lets Stand Ninth Circuit Ban on ‘Salary History’ Defense to an Equal Pay Act Claim Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Oct
6
2022
U.S. Supreme Court Grants Certiorari in Case Involving Application of Attorney-Client Privilege to Dual-Purpose Communications with Tax Attorneys Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Oct
11
2017
U.S. Supreme Court Dismisses Travel Ban Case Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Oct
15
2015
U.S. Supreme Court Denies Defendants’ Petition for Certiorari in Schwab Case Relating to Violation of Fundamental Investment Policies Vedder Price
Mar
27
2019
U.S. Supreme Court Declines to Hear Zappos Data Breach Case Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins