D.C. Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals is the Federal District Court in Washington, DC. The circuit is often referred to as “the District”, “Washington”, and often referred to by its initials, D.C., and is the capital of the United States.

The District of Columbia is governed by the US Constitution, which gives it the jurisdictional power to Congress, so it is not governed by any one state in the United States. The Federal District courthouse sits in the District of Columbia City Hall Building at Judiciary Square. The DC Court of Appeals and the  Superior Court of the District of Columbia make up the local court system in that district.

“The court of last resort” is often what the District of Columbia is referred to, as parties should try to have their cases settled in their respective state or circuit courts. The court has the authority to hear all final orders, specified interlocutory orders, judgments, and decisions which are made by certain government agencies in D.C. The Court is also permitted to hear cases which need to have cases which present questions of law presented by the Supreme Court heard. Given its power through Congress, the court is authorized to review proposed rules from trial courts and develop its own rules for proceedings which go through the court.

Currently there are eight associate judges and the circuit judge which are hearing cases which come through the District of Columbia circuit. At this level, judges are appointed to 15-year terms after being nominated by the President and appointed by the US Senate. Currently, the chief justice of the circuit is Anna Blackburne-Rigsby, who was initially appointed during the Clinton administration as an associate judge.

Unlike other circuits, the District of Columbia circuit issues MOJs, or memorandums of justice in cases where decisions do not result in new law. MOJs are also issued in cases where cases don’t decide on an important issue/federal question, or in cases which don’t interpret a statute or concept, which hasn’t yet been decided on. The court also publishes opinions in cases where both litigants and the trial court, create a new law, interpret statutes, or interpret important concepts in the legal system.

The National Law Review covers a broad range of MOJ findings as well as case opinions which are decided by the District of Columbia circuit. We cover: federal questions, retaliation claims, cybersecurity claims, Agency news, labor and employment, and other important federally driven cases. The National Law Review also focuses on appointments, and general news and elections , bankruptcy, tax cases, and other cases which go through the circuit’s system.   

Custom text Title Sort descending Organization
Jul
13
2015
Common Sense Sometimes Matters: NLRB Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
1
2018
Communications Decency Act Protects Website Operators from Liability Despite Blogger Content Policy Wilson Elser Moskowitz Edelman & Dicker LLP
Aug
19
2015
Complaint Issued by NLRB’s Acting General Counsel was Unauthorized, D.C. Appeals Court Rules Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
14
2015
Condition of Payment Limitation on Implied Certification Cases is Alive and Well in the D.C. Circuit McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
19
2015
Conflict Minerals Decision – Now What? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
10
2015
Conflict Minerals Rehearing Denied — Is the Legal Challenge Over? Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
16
2014
Conflict Minerals Rule Update: D.C. Circuit Court Denies Request for Stay Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
13
2019
Conflicting Opinions Regarding the Validity of the FCC’s Pre-2015 ATDS Rulings Faegre Drinker
Jul
25
2014
Conflicting Rulings on Health Insurance Subsidies Raise Concerns Among Insurers and Providers Armstrong Teasdale
Mar
28
2018
Confusion Ensues After Appeal Over Fiduciary Rule in D.C. Circuit Dropped Proskauer Rose LLP
Nov
17
2017
Congressional Bill: Joint Employer Liability May Become More Limited Jackson Lewis P.C.
Nov
29
2013
Construction Contractor Sues Office of Federal Contract Compliance Programs (OFCCP) To Block New Regulations Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Oct
28
2019
Consulting With Native American Tribes on Energy and Infrastructure Development: Strategies for Reducing Project Risk Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Nov
21
2016
Consumer Financial Protection Bureau Seeks Rehearing of D.C. Circuit Panel Ruling in PHH: What Now? Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
21
2019
Contractors, Your Subcontractors’ Wage and Hour Practices are Your Business Jackson Lewis P.C.
May
8
2019
Converting an IPR Loss into a District Court Win Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
26
2020
Copyright Board Ordered to Take a New Look at Streaming Services Rate Structure McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
8
2023
Copyright, AI and Artistic Expression: Grappling with a New Reality in the World of Artificial Intelligence Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Oct
3
2011
Cordis v. BSC – Therasense at Work Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
16
2017
Court Declines to Vacate Environmental Assessment of Dakota Access Pipeline, Permitting Oil to Flow during Remand Cadwalader, Wickersham & Taft LLP
Jan
11
2018
Court Denies English’s Preliminary Injunction Motion; Mulvaney Continues to Exercise Acting CFPB Director Authority Ballard Spahr LLP
Feb
3
2017
Court Denies Motions to Intervene in PHH v. CFPB Litigation Covington & Burling LLP
May
17
2019
Court Denies Reinsurers’ Attempts to Avoid Suit Carlton Fields
Sep
5
2019
Court Dismisses Challenge to TTB’s Rejection of Health Claims on Vodka McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
23
2019
Court Enforces ICSIC Award Carlton Fields
Dec
5
2017
Court enters scheduling order in CFPB Acting Director dispute Ballard Spahr LLP
Oct
11
2018
Court Finds ACLA Claims Precluded, CMS PAMA Rules Stand Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Oct
11
2018
Court Hears Argument in Association’s Attempt to Block Dept. of Education “Borrower Defense” Rule from Taking Effect on Oct. 12 Ballard Spahr LLP
May
16
2012
Court Invalidates Ambush Election Regulation Dinsmore & Shohl LLP
Jan
4
2019
Court Issues Permanent Injunction Blocking Medicare 340B Payment Cuts McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
14
2017
Court Limits FERC’s Authority to Direct Modifications Under Section 205 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Apr
14
2015
Court Limits the GHG Permit Rule to Align with UARG v. EPA ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jan
27
2014
Court of Appeals Decisions Will Stick on the National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) Poster Rule McBrayer, McGinnis, Leslie and Kirkland, PLLC
Dec
26
2017
Court of Appeals Throws Lifeline to Major D.C.-Area Infrastructure Project Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Mar
6
2019
Court Orders Surprise EEO-1 Pay Data Collection Requirement Reinstatement—But When? Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins