D.C. Circuit (incl. bankruptcy)

The District of Columbia Court of Appeals is the Federal District Court in Washington, DC. The circuit is often referred to as “the District”, “Washington”, and often referred to by its initials, D.C., and is the capital of the United States.

The District of Columbia is governed by the US Constitution, which gives it the jurisdictional power to Congress, so it is not governed by any one state in the United States. The Federal District courthouse sits in the District of Columbia City Hall Building at Judiciary Square. The DC Court of Appeals and the  Superior Court of the District of Columbia make up the local court system in that district.

“The court of last resort” is often what the District of Columbia is referred to, as parties should try to have their cases settled in their respective state or circuit courts. The court has the authority to hear all final orders, specified interlocutory orders, judgments, and decisions which are made by certain government agencies in D.C. The Court is also permitted to hear cases which need to have cases which present questions of law presented by the Supreme Court heard. Given its power through Congress, the court is authorized to review proposed rules from trial courts and develop its own rules for proceedings which go through the court.

Currently there are eight associate judges and the circuit judge which are hearing cases which come through the District of Columbia circuit. At this level, judges are appointed to 15-year terms after being nominated by the President and appointed by the US Senate. Currently, the chief justice of the circuit is Anna Blackburne-Rigsby, who was initially appointed during the Clinton administration as an associate judge.

Unlike other circuits, the District of Columbia circuit issues MOJs, or memorandums of justice in cases where decisions do not result in new law. MOJs are also issued in cases where cases don’t decide on an important issue/federal question, or in cases which don’t interpret a statute or concept, which hasn’t yet been decided on. The court also publishes opinions in cases where both litigants and the trial court, create a new law, interpret statutes, or interpret important concepts in the legal system.

The National Law Review covers a broad range of MOJ findings as well as case opinions which are decided by the District of Columbia circuit. We cover: federal questions, retaliation claims, cybersecurity claims, Agency news, labor and employment, and other important federally driven cases. The National Law Review also focuses on appointments, and general news and elections , bankruptcy, tax cases, and other cases which go through the circuit’s system.   

Custom text Title Sort ascending Organization
Sep
10
2011
SEC Not to Seek Rehearing of Proxy Access Decision Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
11
2024
SEC Greenlights Bitcoin ETFs: What Happened and What It Portends Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
7
2023
SEC Denial of Proposed Bitcoin Exchange-Traded Product Arbitrary and Capricious: DC Circuit Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Sep
18
2023
SEC Denial of Grayscale Bitcoin Fund Was Arbitrary and Capricious, Rules DC Circuit Court of Appeals Katten
Jan
16
2024
SEC Approves Exchange Listing Applications for Spot Bitcoin ETPs Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
2
2018
SEC Administrative Law Judges: Key Takeaways and Lingering Questions from Lucia v. SEC Vedder Price
Jun
12
2017
Search Is On: Federal Court Upholds NLRB’s Imposition of Job-Search Costs on Employer Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
27
2017
Seafood Traceability Rule to Remain in Place, Says Court Keller and Heckman LLP
Jun
21
2018
SDNY, Disagreeing With D.C. Circuit, Finds CFPB Structure Unconstitutional And Strikes Title X Of CFPA In Its Entirety Ballard Spahr LLP
Oct
18
2012
Scope of Non-Access Policies Limited by Recent NLRB Decisions ArentFox Schiff LLP
Aug
25
2015
Scope of Attorney-Client Privilege And Work Product Doctrine In Internal Investigations Clarified Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
12
2018
Saved By The En Banc: CFPB Appears Here To Stay K&L Gates
Sep
29
2015
Royalty Allocations for Royalty Pools Must Be Well Reasoned and Based on a Record McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
24
2015
Risk Management Lessons from a Multi-Million-Dollar Class Action Award Covington & Burling LLP
Apr
27
2018
Researchers May Challenge the Constitutionality of the CFAA “Access” Provision as Applied to Web Scraping Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
22
2018
Rescission of H-4 Employment Authorization Documents (EADs) Expected Jackson Lewis P.C.
Oct
6
2012
Republican members of Congress file amicus briefs to challenge NLRB recess appointments Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Aug
4
2022
Remote ID Ruling For FAA in RaceDayQuads Suit Robinson & Cole LLP
Jun
14
2022
RED ROBIN WINS BIG: Company Purveys Tasty Burgers AND Big ATDS Wins Troutman Amin, LLP
May
22
2020
Recent USCIS Settlement Offers Substantial Relief to H-1B Employers Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Aug
17
2018
Recent District Court Decisions Highlight Conflicting Stances on Dismissal of Frivolous FCA Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
28
2014
Recent Developments in Cases Dealing with the False Claims Act’s First-to-File and Public Disclosure Bars Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
17
2023
Recent DC Circuit Court of Appeals Case Brings FINRA to the Forefront of the SRO State Actor Controversy Katten
May
1
2020
Recent Cases May Help Alleviate Concerns for H-1B Employers Ogletree, Deakins, Nash, Smoak & Stewart, P.C.
Mar
28
2018
Reassigned Numbers: Sailing Towards A New TCPA “Safe Harbor?” Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
25
2014
Re-Calculating Patent Term Adjustments Once Again Bracewell LLP
Sep
4
2018
Public Entities: Federal Decision Supports Cross-Border Application of Public Tort-Claims Protections Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Mar
8
2018
Public Advocacy Group Sues OFCCP in Connection with EEO-1 FOIA Requests Jackson Lewis P.C.
Oct
9
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 9, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
26
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 26, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
9
2020
PTAB Designates Two Opinions Precedential and One Opinion Informative, Further Clarifying the Scope of the Board’s Discretion under § 325(d) to Decline Institution McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
12
2013
Proofs of Claim: Attorney Signatures and the Risk of Loss of Privileges Greenberg Traurig, LLP
May
31
2018
Program for Foreign Entrepreneurs to End Jackson Lewis P.C.
Mar
26
2014
Proceed with Caution: D.C. District Court Says Attorney-Client Privilege and Work Product Doctrine Do Not Survive Internal Fraud Investigation Conducted by Non-Attorneys Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
9
2021
Privilege Dwindles for Data Breach Reports Bracewell LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins