Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Aug
29
2019
Italian Film Composer “Scores” for Authors Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
29
2019
Fractured Federal Circuit Maintains Ineligibility Of Diagnostic Methods McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2019
Check Processing Claims Bounce McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2019
One-Year Time Bar Triggered After the Service of a Complaint, Regardless of Whether the Serving Party Lacked Standing to Sue Polsinelli PC
Aug
28
2019
Not So Fast And Furious – Executive Indicted for Stealing Self-Driving Car Trade Secrets Jones Walker LLP
Aug
27
2019
Recent ITC Ruling Highlights Ability of Patentees to Rely on Accused Infringers’ Investments to Satisfy Domestic Industry Requirement and Potential Pitfall of Affirmative Defense Mintz
Aug
27
2019
Nalproprion v. Actavis: WDR met by Substantially Equivalent Claim Elements(?) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
27
2019
All Complaints Once Served—Even Defective Complaints that are Dismissed—Trigger the IPR Time Bar Mintz
Aug
27
2019
Federal Circuit Contrives Substantially Similar Written Description Test Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
26
2019
“Addressing Video Game Claims Under the Phillips Standard at the PTAB” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
23
2019
Alexa: What is venue? Mintz
Aug
22
2019
IP Economy – Intangible Assets as Collateral Ballard Spahr LLP
Aug
22
2019
Celebrity Entertainer Sues Over Video Game Avatar Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
22
2019
In A Reckless Re-Price, Results Are Not Realized K&L Gates
Aug
21
2019
ANDA Applicant Dismissed for Lack of Venue Under § 1400(b) as District of New Jersey Departs from its own and the District of Delaware’s Prior Rulings Mintz
Aug
21
2019
The Claridge's Affair: A Win, but at What Cost? K&L Gates
Aug
20
2019
Doctrine Of Equivalents Not Barred By Claim Amendments Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
19
2019
Federal Circuit Cautions Against Rigid Approach to Prosecution History Estoppel in Fourth Appeal from ALIMTA® Litigations Mintz
Aug
16
2019
A Case of Bananas: Costume Copyright Infringement Stark & Stark
Aug
16
2019
Bronze, Shape, Glow: A Copyright Tale Destined For Broadway K&L Gates
Aug
14
2019
New French PACTE Law – How is it Affecting French IP Law? McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
13
2019
Don’t Feel Bad for Protecting Your Franchise and Trademark Rights
Aug
13
2019
Federal Circuit Agrees Genotyping Method Is Not Eligible For Patenting Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
13
2019
PTAB Trial Practice Guide Update Codifies Recent PTAB Decisions and Procedure (Third and Last of a Series) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
12
2019
PTAB Confirms (Again) that the AIA’s “Enhanced Estoppel” Provision Applies to Concurrent IPR Proceedings Mintz
Aug
12
2019
Genotyping Patent Claims Do Not Escape The Reach of s. 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
9
2019
Effect of Prosecution History Estoppel on Infringement Claim under Doctrine of Equivalents Mintz
Aug
9
2019
Give and Take: IPR of Pre-AIA Patent is NOT an Unconstitutional Taking Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins