Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Mar
28
2018
A Picture Is Worth a Thousand Words, but Owning a Piece of the Bundle Is Priceless. McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Jumpman Logo Ruling Is a Slam Dunk for Nike McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Eyeing the Line for Fair Use McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Put All Your RPIs on the Table: Petitioner Bears Burden to Prove List of Real-Parties-in-Interest Is Correct McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Tribal Sovereign Immunity Does Not Apply to IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Hi Ho Silver: Texas Supreme Court Finds Patent Agent Communications Protected McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Injecting Claim Construction into Motion to Dismiss Analysis Is Improper McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Bring All Your Claims Together: No Piecemeal Declaratory Judgment Actions McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Activity Outside Licensed “Field of Use” Not a Material Breach McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Deference, Discovery and District Court Findings McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Counting the Days: PTA Calculated from Date National Stage Commences McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Doctrine of “Ancillary Venue” Does Not Trump TC Heartland Mintz
Mar
28
2018
PTO Clarifies Written Description Guidance for Claims Drawn to Antibodies McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Incorporation by Reference: Context May Affect Written Description Support for Later-Added Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Recent PTAB Studies: Expanded Panels and Orange Book-Listed Patents
Mar
28
2018
Knee Brace Patent Application Gets a Leg Up McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
28
2018
Zazzle And Other Print-On-Demand Websites Can Breathe A Sigh Of Relief . . . For Now Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Mar
28
2018
Examiner’s Reason for Allowance May Be Sufficient to Show Prosecution Disclaimer McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Federal Circuit’s “Only Permissible Finding” Is to Reverse PTAB McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Distribution Agreement Qualifies as Commercial Offer for Sale McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Substantial Evidence Supports Non-Obviousness in Helmet Case McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Subjective Preference Is No Excuse for Ignoring Teaching Away McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Escaping Summary Judgment Under § 101 McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
27
2018
Complaint Sheltered From Dismissal In Patent Row Over Personal Tents Proskauer Rose LLP
Mar
27
2018
Case to Watch: Goldman v. Breitbart, involving embedded Tweets of Tom Brady recruiting Kevin Durant in the Hamptons Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
27
2018
Implications for Chinese Investment in the US After Section 301 Report Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Mar
27
2018
UPDATE: The Federal Defend Trade Secrets Act vs. The California Uniform Trade Secrets Act Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
27
2018
Federal Circuit Finds Composition of Matter Ineligible For Patenting Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins