Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
28
2018
Cleveland Clinic – Time to Purport an Inventive Concept in a Diagnostic Invention? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
28
2018
Judge Saris Opines on Copyright Infringement in 3-D Greeting Card Case Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
27
2018
Pleading a Claim for Misappropriation of Trade Secrets in California: A Problem of Particularity Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
26
2018
The Federal Circuit Reverses and Vacates the District Court’s Dismissal Under Rule 12(b)(6), for not Considering Allegations of Fact That Could Preclude Dismissal Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
26
2018
The Federal Circuit Reverses and Vacates Invalidity Determinations by the Board After Lack of Substantial Evidence Supported the Board’s Findings Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
26
2018
Board Rules that Tribal Immunity is Unavailable to Avoid Inter Partes Review Challenge
Feb
26
2018
Latest Tool in the Fight against Alice: USPTO Publishes a New Eligibility Quick Reference Sheet Mintz
Feb
23
2018
Successful Appeals of PTAB Decisions: In re Hodges Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
23
2018
Federal Circuit Reverses Rule 12(b)(6) Dismissal on Section 101 Grounds Due to Factual Allegations Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Feb
23
2018
$500,000 Given to Jam Manufacturer in Trade Secret Recipe Violation - Using Trade Secrets in the Accelerating World of International Commerce Vedder Price
Feb
23
2018
Designing aftermarket auto parts: exhausting design patent rights K&L Gates
Feb
22
2018
U.S. Federal Court Rules Embedding a Tweet Could Be Copyright Infringement K&L Gates
Feb
22
2018
Patent Exhaustion Defense Unavailable to Reseller after Impression Products Mintz
Feb
22
2018
PTO Litigation Report – February 22, 2018 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
22
2018
Updates to USPTO eMod Project to Improve E-Filing/Managing Patent Applications Mintz
Feb
22
2018
The More Things Change, The More They...Change: Recent Developments In Trade Secrets Protection And Non-Competition Law Dickinson Wright PLLC
Feb
22
2018
The Often Overlooked Step In Drafting And Prosecuting Software-Related Patents Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
21
2018
Pair of Federal Circuit Decisions May Impact Early Section 101 Challenges in Patent Litigation Katten
Feb
21
2018
Reverse or Remand: What is the proper remedy on appeal where the Board fails to carry its burden? Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
21
2018
Exclusion of Evidence at the PTAB - Does it ever happen? Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
21
2018
CAFC Rule 36 Judgement: 24 Hour Affirmance with No Explanation Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
21
2018
Re-Thinking Supply Chain Contracts in the World of Connected Things Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
21
2018
PTO Litigation Report – February 21, 2018 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
20
2018
Factual Questions May Preclude Early Resolution of Invalidity under Section 101 Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
20
2018
Electronic Return Receipt Patent Dispute Dubbed “Exceptional Case” After Summary Judgment Award Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
20
2018
PTO Litigation Report – February 20, 2018 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
20
2018
Are These INOMax Therapeutic Method Claims Directed To A Natural Phenomenon? Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
20
2018
USITC Issues Two More Decisions On Requests For Early Disposition Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins