Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jul
27
2017
Remand Where PTAB Decision Does Not Explain Reasoning, Account for All Evidence McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
Patent Owner Must Receive Notice of References Against Each Challenged Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
Skky Found the Limit for “Means” Terms McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
When Asserting Arbitration Provisions, Think Inside the Box: Roof N Box v. Building Materials McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
PTO Litigation Report – July 27, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
27
2017
Standard for Claim Indefiniteness Virtually Relaxes: One-E-Way v. Sony McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
Automation of Manual Process Is Not a Patentable Improvement McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
Patentee’s Willful Ignorance, Vexatious Lawsuits Set Off Alarm Bells McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
Hair Care Company Can’t Wash Away Absence of Infringement: Grayson O Company v. Agadir International McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
PTO Attorneys’ Fees Are Fixed Costs and Thus Recoverable Expenses McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
A Court Divided: Judges File Widely Varying Opinions on CBM Review Eligibility McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
27
2017
Say My Name: Beyoncé Files Trademarks For Her Newborn Twins’ Names K&L Gates
Jul
27
2017
Settling the Hawkwind Trademark Flap: Dave Brock v. Nik Turner McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
26
2017
Ninth Circuit Purges Anti-SLAPP Motion for Contract Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
26
2017
“Ruff” Start for Defendant in Pet Ramp Patent Dispute Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
26
2017
Federal Circuit Thoroughly Reverses District Court Findings of Velcade® Patent Obviousness Mintz
Jul
26
2017
PTO Litigation Report – July 26, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
26
2017
Robotic Review: The Use of Artificial Intelligence in Contract Review Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
25
2017
Federal Circuit Rejects District Court’s Invalidity Finding Based on Key Tenets of Non-Obviousness Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
25
2017
PTO Litigation Report – July 25, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
24
2017
EU General Data Protection Regulation: A Summary for Non-EU Businesses Vedder Price
Jul
24
2017
Taking Advantage of Global Supply Chain for Patent Examination Ward and Smith, P.A.
Jul
24
2017
PTO Litigation Report – July 24, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
21
2017
Artificial Intelligence Legal Revolution - It Began with Parking Tickets... Polsinelli PC
Jul
21
2017
PTO Litigation Report – July 21, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
20
2017
Causal Nexus Requirement for Showing Irreparable Harm in Multi-consumer, Multi-Feature Products Only Requires An infringing Feature to be “A Driver” of Demand Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
20
2017
FTC Reaffirms that IoT Devices Must Comply with COPPA Mintz
Jul
20
2017
PTO Litigation Report – July 20, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins