Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
2
2017
Why Should Startups Care About Intellectual Property? Varnum LLP
Jun
2
2017
Helping “Insure” Your Success: When and How to Use “Insurance” Extension Requests Faegre Drinker
Jun
1
2017
Absent Commercial Use, Copyright Law Likely Preempts Right of Publicity Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2017
Supreme Court Bolsters Patent Exhaustion: A Patentee’s Sale of an Item Automatically Exhausts All Patent Rights in the Item Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jun
1
2017
Impression v. Lexmark: Patent Rights Exhausted by Sale, Domestic or Abroad Vedder Price
Jun
1
2017
Who Wore It Best? Virtually Identical Fabric Design Supports Inference of Copying McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2017
Time to Zoom In on Application of DMCA Safe Harbor Defense McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2017
Whose Unregistered Trademark Is It Anyway? McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2017
Patent Owner Extinguishes IPR by Amending Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2017
Without Controlling Interest, Co-Defendants Are Not Real Parties-in-Interest in IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2017
Facebook, et al. v. Skky: Patent Holders Can Evade Covered Business Methods Review by Disclaiming CBM Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2017
Supreme Court to Review Whether PTAB Must Address All Issues Raised in IPR Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2017
How Startups Can Avoid Costly IP Mistakes Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jun
1
2017
Third Circuit Declines to Send Pay-for-Delay Litigation to Federal Circuit McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
1
2017
What the Supreme Court’s Latest Patent Decision Means for Automotive Suppliers Foley & Lardner LLP
May
31
2017
U.S. Supreme Court Limits a Patentee’s Ability to Enforce Downstream Patent Rights Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
31
2017
Supreme Court to Patent Holders: Sell Product Anywhere, Exhaust Patent Rights Everywhere McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2017
Amended Statute Harmonizes Texas and Federal Trade Secret Protection and Litigation Hunton Andrews Kurth
May
31
2017
Prior Product Use Limits “Pharmaceutical Batches” Claims to Process Disclosed in Patent Example McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2017
Interpretation of Means-Plus-Function Claim Limitations: Core Wireless Licensing S.A.R.L. v. Apple Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2017
Exhausted: The Supreme Court Takes The Federal Circuit To Task (Again) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
31
2017
Supreme Court Overrules and Rewrites 25 Years of Federal Circuit Law on Patent Exhaustion Mintz
May
31
2017
Sometimes It’s Better to Forgo Appeal: Wasica Finance GmbH v. Continental Automotive Systems Inc., et al. McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2017
Face It: Inventive Concept Bar Requires More than Simple Algorithm Addition McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2017
Inter Partes Re-Examination Estoppel Saves Rejected Claims McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2017
Developments in European and U.S. Trademark, Copyright, and Design Law [PODCAST] McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2017
Supreme Court Holds First Authorized Domestic or International Sale Exhausts U.S. Patent Rights Foley & Lardner LLP
May
31
2017
Nichia Corp. v. Everlight Americas: Infringement Does Not Mean Injunction McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins