Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
May
25
2017
U.S. Supreme Court Limits Patent Action Venue Barnes & Thornburg LLP
May
25
2017
PTO Litigation Report – May 25, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
24
2017
Supreme Court Reinstates Venue Limitations in Patent Cases Hunton Andrews Kurth
May
24
2017
Federal Circuit Gives PTAB Free Hand on Claim Construction Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
May
24
2017
100 Million Reasons For Open Source Compliance Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
24
2017
Patent Litigation Venue: Supreme Court Clarifies Venue Statutes in TC Heartland v. Kraft Foods. Mintz
May
24
2017
Supreme Court Patent Ruling: What Lies Ahead Polsinelli PC
May
24
2017
Supreme Court Restricts Patent Venue Proskauer Rose LLP
May
24
2017
PTO Litigation Report – May 24, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
23
2017
Supreme Court Unanimously Changes Where Patents May Be Litigated Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
23
2017
SCOTUS to Decide: Is PTAB Required to Determine Patentability of All Claims Challenged in an IPR Petition? Hunton Andrews Kurth
May
23
2017
U.S. Supreme Court Restricts Locations in which Patent Suits May Be Filed Vedder Price
May
23
2017
Practical Issues for the Pharmaceutical and Biopharmaceutical Industry in the Wake of TC Heartland Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
23
2017
Supreme Court Changes Where Patent Lawsuits Can Be Filed Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
23
2017
PTO Litigation Report – May 23, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
23
2017
US Supreme Court Clarifies Where Corporations Can Be Sued for Patent Infringement Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
May
23
2017
Supreme Court Grants Cert In SAS To Decide Required Scope Of PTAB Decision Foley & Lardner LLP
May
23
2017
CAFC Finds ANDA Infringement Despite Differences Between FDA Labeling And Claim Language Foley & Lardner LLP
May
23
2017
Change of Scenery: TC Heartland Reshapes the Patent Litigation Landscape Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
22
2017
US Supreme Court Limits Venue in Patent Cases—Is It the Death Knell for Forum Shopping? Katten
May
22
2017
The Supreme Court Reverses Decades-Old Venue Precedent and Re-affirms Fourco Foley & Lardner LLP
May
22
2017
Texas’ Loss is Delaware’s Gain: Navigating the Post-TC Heartland Landscape of Patent Litigation Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
22
2017
Federal Circuit’s Primer on Equivalence Infringement of Chemical Process Patents Foley & Lardner LLP
May
19
2017
Federal Circuit Clarifies Scope of On-Sale Bar & Holds That Absence of Regulatory Approval Before The Critical Date Doesn't Prevent Sale & Completion of Phase III Studies & Final FDA Approval Aren't Pre-Requisites For Invention To Be Ready For Patenting Hunton Andrews Kurth
May
19
2017
PTO Litigation Report – May 19, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
19
2017
Federal Circuit Reaffirms the Board’s Decision to Terminate a Reexamination As to Only Litigated Claims in a Civil Action Hunton Andrews Kurth
May
19
2017
You Can Not Claim What you Don’t Possess – Federal Circuit Holds Fiber Optic Claims Invalid under Section 112 Mintz
May
18
2017
Ninth Circuit Holds The GOOGLE Trademark Is Not The Victim Of “Genericide” Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins