Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
May
27
2009
Credit Card Companies Are Not Liable for Contributory Copyright Infringement Clark & Trevithick
May
27
2009
The Financial Consequences of Using Unlicensed Software Clark & Trevithick
Jul
7
2009
Summary of Digital Legislation Affecting Colorado Fairfield and Woods P.C.
Jul
24
2009
Is Your Intellectual Property (IP) ‘Insured’? 10 Tips to Protecting Your IP Investment Fairfield and Woods P.C.
Aug
2
2023
In re Couvaras, No. 2022-1489 (Fed. Cir. June 14, 2023) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
25
2013
Creating Intellectual Property is Hard; Losing It to Uncle Sam is Easy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
11
2016
Recent Developments in Recordal Procedures for Trademark Licenses in China Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
15
2023
Petitioner Failed to Establish Standing in IPR Appeal Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jul
17
2019
Don’t Spill Your Trade Secrets: Protecting Your Competitive Advantage in the Food and Beverage Industry (Part 1 of 2) Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
21
2016
Improper Use of Commercial Signs — Proposed Revisions to Article 5 of the PRC Anti-Unfair Competition Law Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jan
18
2024
Federal Circuit Affirms Skinny Label Carve Outs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
26
2019
“Addressing Video Game Claims Under the Phillips Standard at the PTAB” Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
7
2024
George Carlin Was Funny – Copying His Likeness AIn’t – Estate Settles AI-based Copyright Claims Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
27
2014
Bargaining with the Little Green Robot: Understanding the Google Play Developer Distribution Agreement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
27
2016
Sixth Circuit Rules in Favor of Songwriter’s Heirs in Copyright Termination Decision in Jackson Brumley et al. v. Albert Brumley & Sons Inc. et al. Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
24
2020
Limited Relief for Patent and Trademark Applicants Affected by COVID-19 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
25
2020
Intellectual Property Outlook: Cases and Trends to Follow in 2020 — PART 4 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Apr
2
2020
USPTO Permitting Patent Applicants to Extend Certain Deadlines Due to COVID-19 Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
3
2016
Ninth Circuit Retires Fee-Award Standard, Imports Octane Fitness to Trademark Cases Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Sep
22
2020
Fifth Circuit Affirms Attorney’s Fee Award of $2.3 million in Misappropriation Case Against Former Employee who Failed to Comply with Court’s Objections Order Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
10
2021
Federal Circuit Agrees to Reconsider Ruling in GSK v. Teva Drug Patent Case Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
16
2021
Diminution in Value As A Measure of Damages for Trade Secret Misappropriation Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
20
2014
China Court Ruled Infringement for Ambush Marketing in Film Industry Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
30
2021
Trade Secret vs. Patent – a False Dichotomy Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
13
2015
The Blurred Line Between Inspiration and Copying - A $7.4 Million Copyright Question Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
1
2009
Creating the (Virtual) American Dream: User-Generated Content and Trademarks in Virtual Worlds Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Nov
19
2021
New York State Employers to Require Transparency in Electronic Monitoring Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
5
2010
Ninth Circuit Finds Employment Agreement Ambiguous As To Whether An Employee's "Ideas" Were Assigned To Employer Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins