Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Nov
7
2019
You Can Have Some Lovin’—But No Personal Jurisdiction McDermott Will & Emery
May
19
2017
You Can Not Claim What you Don’t Possess – Federal Circuit Holds Fiber Optic Claims Invalid under Section 112 Mintz
Aug
1
2016
You Cannot Create A Restrictive Covenant Out of Thin Air Foley & Lardner LLP
May
6
2011
You Cannot “Game” the Appellate System by Filing a “Protective” Cross-Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
16
2023
You Can’t Skirt around Obviousness by Arguing Expectation of Success Must Be Absolute McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
You Can’t Spell “Pressurized Collection Vessel” Without “Collection”: Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. v. Dow Chem. Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
22
2020
You Don’t Say! Federal Trade Commission to hold Public Workshop on Voice Cloning Technologies Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
29
2018
You Have a Creative Genius in the Workplace. Who Owns the Creative Works?
Jul
3
2022
You Heard it Here: The Word THE is Now a Registered Trademark, Owned by Two Parties Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Jan
29
2015
You Say “Tom‘ah’to,” I Say “Tom‘ay’to”: Determining the Correct Pronunciation of Uniquely Coined Trademarks Katten
Nov
13
2018
You Shall Not Pass: Hurdles to Federal Trademark Registration Stark & Stark
May
29
2020
You Streamed What? Copyright Infringement Pitfalls During COVID-19 Summa PLLC
Apr
22
2021
You Want Some “Metchup” with That? McDermott Will & Emery
Apr
24
2020
Your Color-Based Product Packaging Mark Might Be Protectable Trade Dress Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jan
26
2023
Your Gang Did What!? No Matter—No Forfeiture of IP McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
23
2013
Your Hotel Desk Chair May Be Patented Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Feb
9
2022
Your Patent Application Is About To Get A First Office Action: Now What? Mintz
Mar
26
2020
YouTube Enables Ads on Coronavirus Content; Brands Should Evaluate Strategies to Mitigate Inadvertent Backlash Mintz
Nov
30
2016
YouTube Ripping, A Copyright Wildfire IMS Legal Strategies
Feb
15
2017
You’re So Vague: Federal Circuit Sends IPR Decision Back to PTAB for More Thorough Analysis Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Jun
4
2021
You’ve Been Served! – ITC Allows Service Through Respondents’ Amazon.com Seller Profile Pages Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
14
2021
Yu v. Apple – Transubstantiation of a Camera into an Abstract Idea Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
11
2012
Zac Brown Band's Guitar Strap Flap Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
14
2019
Zara v Zara: The Evolving World of "Fashion" K&L Gates
Mar
28
2018
Zazzle And Other Print-On-Demand Websites Can Breathe A Sigh Of Relief . . . For Now Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
5
2014
Zero Damages Does Not Preclude Equitable Relief McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
18
2015
Zero Gravity Inside v. FootBalance System Oy: Denying Request to File Reply to Preliminary Response IPR2015-01769,70 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2016
Zero Gravity Inside v. Footbalance System Oy: Showing Third Party Is Executor Or Board Member Is Insufficient For Real-Parties-In-Interest IPR2015-01769 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins