Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
17
2015
A Circuit Split or Just a Surface-Blemish: Why Kienitz v. Sconnie Nation LLC Doesn’t Conflict with Cariou v. Prince Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
May
1
2014
A Claim of “Authorship” Does Not Raise an Inventorship Dispute McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
29
2020
A Clear Need: To Allege Misappropriation, Identify Trade Secret McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
18
2021
A Closed Book: No Past Infringement, No Reading Between the Lines into the Future McDermott Will & Emery
May
1
2015
A Combination Is Not Obvious If It Is Beyond the Level of Ordinary Skill in the Art, and Other Lessons McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2014
A Combination of References Need Only Provide a “Reasonable Expectation of Success” McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
16
2017
A Comparison of US and EPO Post Grant Practices       Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
31
2014
A Compound Is Obvious Where Only Minor Changes to a Prior Art “Lead Compound” Are Required to Make the Claimed Compound McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
19
2024
A Continuation Application is an Implicit Admission of Obviousness-Type Double Patenting When Filed from a Parent Patent Mintz
Jul
27
2017
A Court Divided: Judges File Widely Varying Opinions on CBM Review Eligibility McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
20
2021
A December to Remember: The Trademark Modernization Act Implemented on December 18, 2021 Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
27
2019
A Decision on Appeal is Final . . . Mostly McDermott Will & Emery
Nov
15
2017
A Deep Dive in Petition Filing Stats Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
A Different "Type" of Lawsuit: Ensuring Proper Use of Licensed Font Programs Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
19
2021
A Dispute Is Bubbling Over for the Prosecco Name Norris McLaughlin P.A.
Aug
18
2014
A Dozen Reasons Why Growth Companies (and Their Investors) Seek Federal Trademark Registrations Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Apr
12
2021
A Fair Use Tale, or All's Well that Ends: The U.S. Supreme Court Holds Google's Use of of JAVA Code to be a Fair Use Under U.S. Copyright Law K&L Gates
Mar
1
2011
A Federal District Court Rules That The Qui Tam Provision of the False Marking Statute is Unconstitutional Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
29
2014
A Few Good Trademarks: The U.S. Military’s Trademark Campaign - OOHRAH! Mintz
Jun
19
2019
A Figurative Mark? A Position Mark? Or Just A Trade Mark? K&L Gates
May
10
2013
A First for Fair, Reasonable and Non-Discriminatory (FRAND): Federal Court in Microsoft v. Motorola Sets FRAND Royalty Rates for Standard Essential Patents McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
3
2015
A First Look at New York City’s Next Generation of Entrepreneurs Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Jul
1
2014
A Football Team, by Any Other Name…: USPTO Decision Illustrates that Law is More than Hard & Fast Rules Varnum LLP
Dec
3
2021
A Forgiving Response to a Candidly Admitted Error But Still Costly Finnegan
Jun
28
2018
A Forum Selection Clause Provides No Basis For Terminating A Section 337 Investigation Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jun
11
2011
A Four-Step Guide for Securing Patent Portfolios after Stanford v. Roche Lowndes, Drosdick, Doster, Kantor & Reed, P.A.
Jun
21
2021
A Fractured Vision of Eligibility — Split Federal Circuit Panel Finds Digital Camera Claims Ineligible Finnegan
Jan
22
2019
A Fresh Look At The Lead Compound Analysis Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins