Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort ascending
May
30
2014
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc., Order Granting Motion to Stay Reexam IPR2014-00043 Faegre Drinker
Jul
29
2016
Early Post-Brexit Considerations for International Business Faegre Drinker
Jun
5
2014
Distinctive Developments, Ltd. v. Uniloc USA, Inc., Denying Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Reply Faegre Drinker
Aug
22
2016
Marco v. Polo: Navigating Around “Likelihood of Confusion” Refusals Faegre Drinker
Apr
22
2020
IP Litigation Considerations in Light of Court Closures and Stay at Home Orders Faegre Drinker
Jun
17
2014
Handi Quilter, Inc. and Tacony Corp. v. Bernina International AG: Procedure for Filing Supplemental Evidence Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2014
Mobotix Corp. v. e-Watch: Order Regarding Failure to File a Patent Owner Response IPR2013-00498 Faegre Drinker
Jun
30
2014
Bank of America, N.A. v. Intellectual Ventures I and II LLC: Denying Motion to Limit Deposition Time Limit Faegre Drinker
Jul
2
2014
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc., Order Regarding Time Bar For Filing IPR IRP2014-00360 Faegre Drinker
Jul
4
2014
Vibrant Media, Inc. v. General Electric Company, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00170 Faegre Drinker
Jul
7
2014
Arris Group, Inc. v. C-Cation Technologies, LLC, Order Granting Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00746 Faegre Drinker
Jul
9
2014
Bank of America, N.A. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC, Denying Request for Rehearing on Institution Faegre Drinker
Jul
13
2014
Prism Pharma Co., Ltd. v. Choongwae Pharma Corporation, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00315 Faegre Drinker
Jul
18
2014
E.I. Du Pont De Nemours and Co. v. Monsanto Technology LLC, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Claims 1-26 of the ’672 Patent Faegre Drinker
Jul
23
2014
ScentAir Technologies, Inc. v. Prolitec, Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00180 Faegre Drinker
Jul
28
2014
Rackspace US, Inc. and Rackspace Hosting, Inc. v. Personal Web Technologies, LLC and Level 3 Communications, Decision on Patent Owner’s Motion to Stay IPR2014-00057 Faegre Drinker
Aug
16
2014
Corning Incorporated v. DSM IP Assets B.V.: Denying Revised Request for Rehearing of Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Aug
19
2014
Macronix v. Spansion LLC: Decision Denying Motion for Joinder Faegre Drinker
Aug
22
2014
SCHOTT Gemtron Corporation v. SSW Holding Company, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00358 Faegre Drinker
Sep
5
2014
REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC v. Neste Oil Oyj: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00178 Faegre Drinker
Sep
10
2014
McClinton Energy Group v. Magnum Oil Tools International: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00231 Faegre Drinker
Sep
13
2014
Mexichem Amanco Holdings v. Honeywell International, Denying Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2013-00576 Faegre Drinker
Sep
17
2014
Samsung Electronics v. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP, Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00514 Faegre Drinker
Sep
26
2014
Respironics, Inc. v. Zoll Medical Corporation: Final Written Decision (Motion to Amend) IPR2013-00322 Faegre Drinker
Sep
30
2014
Medtronic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc., IPR2014-00487: Decision Denying Institution Faegre Drinker
Oct
1
2014
Indeed, Inc., Monster Worldwide Inc., and TheLadders.com, Inc. v. Career Destination Development, LLC: Denying Motion for Leave to File Amended Petition Faegre Drinker
Oct
9
2014
Samsung Electronics and Samsung Telecommunications v. Black Hills Media: Granting in Part Additional Discovery IPR2014-00735, 717 Faegre Drinker
Oct
20
2014
Microsoft Corp. v. Enfish, LLC, Denying Motion to Quash Deposition Notice Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins