Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Nov
1
2017
‘Minute Winner’ loses out in TV format copyright claim Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
31
2017
Design Patent pto litigation statistics (through OCTOBER 15, 2017) [INFOGRAPHIC] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
Preparing European Priority Applications for Stronger U.S. Patents Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
Total Profit on the Article as Sold is Alive and Well in Design Patent Litigation Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
"Retro" Designs: Using Your Utility Portfolio to Expand Design Protection Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
New DMCA Regulations - January 1, 2018 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
A Different "Type" of Lawsuit: Ensuring Proper Use of Licensed Font Programs Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
Sad Tale of a Trademark Fail Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
USITC Maintains General Exclusion Order Against Foam Footwear Despite PTO’s Finding of Unpatentability On Reexamination Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Oct
31
2017
Waymo LLC v. Uber Tech: More Bumps in the Road for Uber along the Trade Secret Highway McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2017
DRK Photo v. McGraw-Hill Global Education Holdings, LLC: Standing to Sue for Copyright Infringement: No Bright Line Rule for Stock Photo Agencies McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2017
General Plastic Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Canon Kabushiki Kaisha: Expanded PTAB Panel Explains Exercise of Discretion on Second-Bite Petitions McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 31, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
31
2017
Arista Networks, Inc. v. International Trade Commission,: Limited Exclusion Order Does Not Require Specific Findings as to Components McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2017
First Data Corp. v. Inselberg: Ownership Dispute Strips Federal Circuit of Jurisdiction to Review McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
31
2017
Allied Mineral Products, Inc. v. Osmi, Inc: Foreign Suit against Customers Insufficient Grounds for US Declaratory Judgment Action by Manufacturer McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Gold Standard Instruments v. US Endodontics: Insufficient Teaching Away Throws Cold Water on Heat-Treating Patent McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Intellectual Ventures LLC v. Motorola Mobility LLC: Message Received: Direct Infringement of System Claim Requires Evidence of Use McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Failure to Propose Proper Hypothetical Claim Dooms Doctrine of Equivalents: Jang v. Boston Scientific Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Anticipated Acts of Infringement May Establish Venue for Hatch-Waxman McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Challenged Claims are Obvious Based on Patent Owners’ Prior Art: Idemitsu Kosan Co., Ltd. v. SFC Co. Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Court Extinguishes Parties’ Motions to Strike in LED Patent Dispute Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
30
2017
Airtight Victory for RV Seal Supplier in Appeal to Overturn Dismissal: Lifetime Indus., Inc. v. Trim-Lok, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
PTAB Should Have Given Credit to Inventor Corroborating Evidence:  NFC Tech., LLC v. Joseph Matal, McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
PTO Litigation Report – October 30, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
30
2017
Broadest Reasonable Interpretation Is Not Broadest Possible Interpretation:  In re Smith Int’l, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
Down to the Wire: Patentee Must Rebut Inherent Functionality of Prior Art McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
30
2017
That’s How the Prima Facie Obviousness Cookie Crumbles McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins