Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Sep
6
2017
PTO Litigation Report – September 6, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
6
2017
Intellectual Property 101: What It Is and Why I Should Protect It Varnum LLP
Sep
6
2017
Patentability Post-Alice: Cracking The Code IMS Legal Strategies
Sep
5
2017
Federal Circuit Rejects PTAB’s Articulation of Obviousness Rationale, Disregard for Evidence, and Burden Shifting Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
5
2017
ITC Issues First Exclusion Order on SEPs and Upcoming Opinion Expected To Provide Important Guidance on FRAND and SEPs Mintz
Sep
5
2017
Should the Australian Patent Office be denying patent eligibility to cDNA inventions?
Sep
1
2017
September 2017 Update: gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
1
2017
Life in the Lowercase Lane: Lessons for Trademark Owners About Genericide Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
1
2017
After Years of Waiting, Yours or Your Competitor’s Patent Application May Quickly issue in Brazil. Are you ready? Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
1
2017
PTO Litigation Report – September 1, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
31
2017
District Court: Network Gaming Patent Claims Not Invalid Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
31
2017
Security Incidents High, Confidence to Manage Them Low. Really? We Did See this Coming – Why Aren't We Better Prepared? K&L Gates
Aug
31
2017
PTO Litigation Report – August 31, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
30
2017
Second Circuit Upholds Uber’s Mobile Contracting Process, Establishing Template for Mobile Online Contracting Proskauer Rose LLP
Aug
30
2017
PTAB’s Consideration of Prior Art Needs a Tune Up: Shinn Fu Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
Stone-Cold Circuit Split on Award of Trademark Profits: Stone Creek Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
PTO Litigation Report – August 30, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
30
2017
Sovereign Immunity Cannot Protect Patent Co-Owned by Private Party: Reactive Surfaces Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
Federal Circuit in Visual Memory Struggles with Alice Test (Part Two) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
30
2017
Trademark 103: Should You Register 3D? IMS Legal Strategies
Aug
30
2017
Federal Circuit in Visual Memory Struggles with Alice Test (Part One) Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Aug
30
2017
Obviousness Reversed for Clear Error in Factual Findings on Combination of References McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
Obviousness Does Not Require Absolute Predictability: Soft Gel Tech v. Jarrow Formulas McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
Disclosed Structure Restricts Breadth of Means-Plus-Function Limitations McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
30
2017
Home Is Where Copyright Non-Infringement Is: Design Basics v. Lexington Homes McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2017
Pre-Merger Intentional Waiver of Privilege Can Extend to Post-Merger Communications: OptumInsight Case McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2017
Cardiovascular Disease Correlation Doesn’t Beat § 101 Challenge: Cleveland Clinic Foundation v. True Health Diagnostics McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2017
Counsel’s Actions Support Inference of Intent to Deceive PTO: Regeneron Pharmaceuticals v. Merus N.V. McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins