Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Mar
2
2017
Johns Manville v. Knauf Insulation: Design Patent Survives AIA Review McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2017
DOJ and FTC Issue Updated Antitrust Guidelines on Licensing of Intellectual Property Foley & Lardner LLP
Mar
2
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 2, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
2
2017
TTAB Serves It Straight Up: TEQUILA Is Not Generic McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
2
2017
Less Utility Than Alternatives Does Not Make Product’s Trade Dress Protectable McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Federal Circuit Orders Google Patent Case Transferred from E.D. Tex. Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
1
2017
Web Page Authentication Patent is Outside the Scope of CBM Review Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
1
2017
Copyright Date Alone Does Not Prove Public Accessibility of Software User Guide McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness Cap on Obviousness Showing McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Keeping Up with the Kardashians’ Attempt to Compel Trademark Arbitration McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
PTO Litigation Report – March 1, 2017 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
1
2017
Lanham Act Cannot Be Used to Create “Species of Mutant Copyright Law” McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Application Partially Voided Where Defendant Lacked Bona Fide Intent to Use Mark McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Federal Circuit Reminds PTAB to Explain its Reasoning Mintz
Mar
1
2017
Patent Owner and Counsel to Pay Double Costs for Frivolous Appeal McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Article III Injury-in-Fact Required to Appeal PTAB Final Written Decision in IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Not Intuitively Obvious: Federal Circuit Remands for Explicit Rational to Combine McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Remand to District Court to Attempt to Identify “Article of Manufacture” for Design Patent Damages McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
1
2017
Federal Circuit Finds Drug Does Not Satisfy Markush Group Requirements; Reverses District Court Finding of Infringement Hunton Andrews Kurth
Mar
1
2017
Federal Circuit Finds Standing to Appeal Reexamination Decisions Even Though Reexamination Requestor Had Not Been Sued For Infringement Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
28
2017
Electronic Trading Claims Are Patent Eligible McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
28
2017
Highest Patent Court Narrows Scope of Covered Business Review Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Feb
28
2017
Wrong Inventor Defense Fails in Pharmaceutical Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
28
2017
The Dos and Don’ts of Letters of Protest Faegre Drinker
Feb
28
2017
Eleventh Circuit: District Court Does Not Have Unlimited Discretion in Assessing Reasonable Attorneys’ Fees McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
28
2017
State Law Cannot Blur the Line Between Patents and Copyrights McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
28
2017
Sonix Technology v. Publications International: “Visually Negligible” Is Not Indefinite McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
28
2017
Usenet Server Owners, Operators Are Not Directly or Secondarily Liable for Copyright Infringement McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins