Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Nov
30
2015
USPTO Launches Public Global Dossier Access Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
26
2015
Actifio, Inc. v. Delphix Corp. - Order Granting Motion to Compel Routine Discovery IPR2015-00015, 16, 19, 25, 26, 34, 100, 108, 128 Faegre Drinker
Nov
25
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 25, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
24
2015
What’s New in the TPP’s Intellectual Property Chapter Covington & Burling LLP
Nov
24
2015
Acxiom Corp. v. Phoenix Licensing: Institution Denied Where Customer Indemnification Insufficient to Establish Standing as Real Party in Interest CBM2015-00134 Faegre Drinker
Nov
24
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 24, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
24
2015
Apple v. Smartflash: Granting Institution in Part Where Intervening Case Law Was Found Insufficient to Prevent Estoppel as to One Challenged Claim CBM2015-00131 Faegre Drinker
Nov
24
2015
Obviousness Versus Obviousness-Type Double Patenting
Nov
23
2015
US Endodontics v. Gold Standard Instruments: Denying Institution For Failure to Explain Why Not Substantially the Same as Asserted in Prior Proceeding IPR2015-01476 Faegre Drinker
Nov
23
2015
Pacific Market International v. Ignite USA: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00750 Faegre Drinker
Nov
23
2015
Kinetic Tech v. Skyworks Solutions: Final Written Decision Finding Evidence of “Printed Publication” Insufficient IPR2014-00690 Faegre Drinker
Nov
23
2015
USPTO Redoubling Efforts to Issue “Clear” Patents – Expect more 112 Rejections Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
23
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 23, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
22
2015
Trans-Pacific Partnership and the Continuing Controversy Over the Exclusivity Period for Biologics Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Nov
20
2015
Zhongshan Broad Ocean Motor v. Nidec Motor Corp: Granting Rehearing of Decision on Institution Allowing Issue Joinder IPR2015-00762 Faegre Drinker
Nov
20
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 20, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
19
2015
Software Patents: History and Strategies (Pt. II – Strategies) Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Nov
19
2015
International Business Machines Corp. v. Intellectual Ventures II: Terminating Proceeding After Finding that Petitioner Could Have Raised Argument in a Prior Proceeding IPR2014-01465 Faegre Drinker
Nov
19
2015
Apple v. Virnetx: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Anticipated IPR2014-00482 Faegre Drinker
Nov
19
2015
HTC COR v. NFC TECHNOLOGY: Declaration Expunged Where Declarant Refused Cross-Examination IPR2014-01198 Faegre Drinker
Nov
19
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 19, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Nov
19
2015
Pennsylvania Supreme Court “Considers” Noncompetes: Mere Continued Employment Not Enough Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Nov
19
2015
Sixth Circuit Differentiates Trade Secrets and Confidential Information Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Nov
19
2015
Federal Circuit Interprets Two Important Infringement Provisions Foley & Lardner LLP
Nov
19
2015
Infomotion Sports Tech v. Pillar Vision: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Obvious IPR2014-00764 Faegre Drinker
Nov
18
2015
ITC’s Authority to Bar Infringing Imports is Limited to Tangible Articles, Does Not Extend to Digital Data Holland & Hart LLP
Nov
18
2015
Apple v. Smartflash: Dismissing Petitioner Due to the Board Finding Estoppel under Section 325(e)(1) CBM2015-00015 Faegre Drinker
Nov
18
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – November 18, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins