Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jul
17
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 17, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
16
2015
Mixing Things Up: Let’s Talk Recipes, Part Two of a Four-Part Series (Patent) Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Jul
16
2015
Supreme Court Affirms 50-year Rule Banning Royalties on Expired Patents ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jul
16
2015
Attacking Patents on Written Description & Enablement Grounds in Inter Partes Review Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
16
2015
Amazon.com, Inc. v. Appistry, Inc.: Denying Institution for Failure to Identify Real Parties in Interest IPR2015-00480 Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2015
Six Tips for Demonstratives in PTAB Hearings Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
16
2015
Toshiba Corporation, et al. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC, Final Written Decision IPR2014-00310 Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2015
LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Delaware Display Group LLC: Granting Institution of One Asserted Ground of Unpatentability IPR2015-00506 Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2015
Apple, Inc. v. ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.: Denying Institution for Failing to Articulate a Reason to Modify IPR2015-00355 Faegre Drinker
Jul
16
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 16, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
16
2015
PTAB Average Time-To-Decision in IPRs May Surprise You
Jul
16
2015
E*TRADE Financial Corp. v. Droplets, Inc. Denying Institution due to Redundacy with Other Proceeding IPR2015-00471 Faegre Drinker
Jul
15
2015
CQG, Inc. and CQGT, LLC v. Trading Technologies International, Inc., District Court Dismissal Without Prejudice Serves As Bar To Petition CBM2015-00057; CBM2015-00058 Faegre Drinker
Jul
15
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 15, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
15
2015
Patent Case Transferred From Georgia, Plaintiff's Principal Place of Business, To California, Defendant's Principal Place of Business Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Jul
14
2015
In Light of Supreme Court’s Spider-Man Case, Which Antitrust Precedents are Ripe for Overturning? ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jul
14
2015
Fifth Circuit Joins Majority on Scope of Copyright Preemption Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jul
14
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 14, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
14
2015
New Patent Examination Guidance in Canada for Evaluating Medical Diagnostic Methods: Will Canada’s Application Be More Flexible than the U.S.? Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jul
14
2015
Contract Manufacturing Makes Angiomax Patents Invalid Under On Sale Bar Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
13
2015
SQUARE v. THINK COMPUTER CORP: PTAB Used Discretion to Deny CBM For Submitting Redundant Grounds CBM2015-00067 Faegre Drinker
Jul
13
2015
Versata Development Group v. SAP America: Federal Circuit Affirms First CBM Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Jul
13
2015
In re Cuozzo – Still no changes for the claim interpretation standard during inter partes review proceedings Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
13
2015
Thieves Among Us? Protecting Trade Secrets From Employee Theft
Jul
13
2015
The Medicines Company v. Hospira - Preparation of validation batches by a contract manufacturer for FDA submission creates an on-scale bar Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
13
2015
Sony and Microsoft Corp. v. ADC Technology: Board Persuaded Not To Deny Petition Under Section 325(d) CBM2015-00026 Faegre Drinker
Jul
13
2015
Apple Inc v. Memory Integrity: Petitioner’s Rehearing Request Granted Because Board Misapprehended Anticipation ArgumentIPR2015-00163 Faegre Drinker
Jul
13
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 13, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins