Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jul
10
2015
Federal Circuit Finds CBM Eligibility Reviewable on Appeal Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
10
2015
First Federal Appellate Court Holds a NonCash Reverse Payment Subject to Antitrust Scrutiny: Is the Third Circuit's Decision in King Drug a Turning Point? Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
10
2015
NESTLÉ USA, INC. v. STEUBEN FOODS, INC., PTAB Considered Opportunity to Litigate in Determining Privity IPR2015-00195 Faegre Drinker
Jul
10
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 10, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
9
2015
Serial Adversaries Are Still No Big Deal: Cherdak v. Koko Fitclub Proskauer Rose LLP
Jul
9
2015
Sharp Corporation v. Surpass Tech Innovation: Denying Request for Rehearing Where a Drafting Error Within a Claim is Not Shown IPR2015-00021 Faegre Drinker
Jul
9
2015
Disparaging Marks: The Washington Redskins Made a Foul Play Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jul
9
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 9, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
9
2015
Intellectual Ventures I v. Capitol One Bank: Mental Steps Doctrine Making Strong Comeback, Courtesy of Alice Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
8
2015
Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corporation: Granting-In-Part Request for Rehearing Because Board Abused Its Discretion Faegre Drinker
Jul
8
2015
Merial Limited v. Virbac: Granting Request for Rehearing Because “Optional” Nature of Claimed Component Not Addressed Faegre Drinker
Jul
8
2015
U.S. District Court Orders Cancellation of Washington NFL Team’s Trademark Registrations Faegre Drinker
Jul
7
2015
New International Searching Authority Available for Green Technology Companies Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
7
2015
Apple v. ContentGuard Holdings: Denying Institution for Failing to Identify Corresponding Means-Plus-Function Structure IPR2015-00354 Faegre Drinker
Jul
7
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 7, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
7
2015
Federal Circuit Upholds USPTO Post-Wyeth Patent Term Adjustment Procedures Foley & Lardner LLP
Jul
6
2015
Alabama Amends Non-Compete Statute Jackson Lewis P.C.
Jul
6
2015
ITC Sheds Light on Economic Prong of Domestic Industry Under Subsection 337(a)(3)(C) and Issues General Exclusion Order Mintz
Jul
6
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – July 6, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jul
6
2015
Nissan, Toyota, Subaru, Honda, Ford, Jaguar, Land Rover, and Volvo v. Cruise Control Technologies: Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Jul
6
2015
Epicor Software Corporation v. Protegrity Corporation: Denying Motion to Consolidate Trials Based Upon Difference in Grounds CBM2015-00006 Faegre Drinker
Jul
6
2015
Decision to Expand Panels Resides with PTAB, Not Parties: Conopco, Inc. dba Unilever v. Procter & Gamble McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
5
2015
FieldComm Group v. Sipco, LLC: Decision Denying Institution Based Upon Failure to Show Disclosure of Each Element IPR2015-00663 Faegre Drinker
Jul
5
2015
Microsoft Corporation v. Biscotti Inc.: Decision Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-01457 Faegre Drinker
Jul
5
2015
Substantially the Same Prior Art - Square Inc. v. Protegrity Corp.; Actifio Inc. v. Delphix Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
5
2015
Apple, Inc. v. ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.: Denying Institution Where Declaration and Exhibits Lacked Specificity By Including Information for Multiple Petitions IPR2015-00356 Faegre Drinker
Jul
4
2015
International Business Machines Corp. v. Intellectual Ventures I LLC: Submission of Supplemental Evidence in an IPR May Be Submitted After the Due Date McDermott Will & Emery
Jul
3
2015
New Amendments to USPTO Post-Grant Regulations McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins