Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Oct
4
2014
Movants Face a High Bar to Succeed on Motions to Amend: Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2014
Patent Owners: Better Address All Obviousness Arguments Raised by Petitioner, Pharmatech Solutions, Inc. v. LifeScan Scotland Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
4
2014
PTAB Grants Request for Rehearing Relating to Procedure for Serving Petitions, Facebook, Inc. v. Rembrandt Social Media, L.P. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Inter Partes Review Not Stayed, Despite Looming Patent Ownership Trial, Symantec Corp. v. RPost Commc’ns Ltd. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Don’t Throw It Away: A Company May Not Have Rights to Confidential Information It Puts in the Garbage, Greenpeace, Inc. v. The Dow Chemical Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Neste Oil OYJ v. REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC, Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion to Strike Reply Evidence IPR2013-00578 Faegre Drinker
Oct
3
2014
Petitioner Barred from Raising Arguments Not in Petition, TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Elecs., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Counsel May Confer with a Witness between Cross-Examination and Re-Cross, but the Witness Might Be Re-Crossed on the Substance of Such a Discussion, Organik Kimya AS v. Rohm and Haas Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Know the Patent Specification Before Filing a Motion to Amend: Veeam Software Corp. v. Symantec Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
The Narrow Scope of Supplemental Discovery in an Inter Partes Review: Square, Inc., v. REM Holdings 3, LLC McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Did the USPTO Really Improve the ‘After Final Consideration Pilot’? Mintz
Oct
3
2014
Supplemental Information Authorization Hard to Come By: International Business Machines Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Motions to Amend Hard to Come By: Zodiac Pool Systems, Inc. v. Aqua Products, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
3
2014
Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC, Decision on Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review Faegre Drinker
Oct
3
2014
Norman International, Inc. v. Andrew J. Toti Testamentary Trust, Russell L. Hinckley, Sr. (Co-Trustee) and Robert F. Miller (Co-Trustee) Granting and Denying Motion to Submit Supplemental Information Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
K-40 Electronics, LLC v. Escort, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00240 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
Microsoft Corporation v. Enfish: Denying Motion for Joinder and Institution IPR2014-00574 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
First Final CBM Decision Invalidates Patent Under § 101: U.S. Bancorp v. Retirement Capital Access Management Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
Medtronic, Inc. and Medtronic Vascular, Inc. v. Endotach LLC: Denying Authorization to File Errata Sheet IPR2014-00100 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
Becton, Dickinson and Company v. One StockDuq Holdings, LLC: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00235 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
Federal Circuit Affirms Dismissal Where Co-Owner of Patent Refuses to Join Suit Mintz
Oct
2
2014
PTAB Applies “Issue Joinder” Analysis to Deny Microsoft’s IPR Joinder Requests Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
2
2014
IGB Automotive and I.G. Bauerhin v. Gentherm: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00663 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Designates Two Recent Decisions as Informative, Garmin v. Cuozzo; Idle Free Systems v. Bergstrom McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
Target Corporation v. Destination Maternity Corporation: Denying Motion for Joinder and Denying Institution IPR2014-00508 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2014
CBM Review Cannot Proceed if Petitioner Filed Civil Suit Challenging Patent’s Validity Prior to Filing Review Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
Federal Circuit Remands Trio of Attorneys’ Fee Award Cases Back to District Courts in the Octane Fitness and Highmark Cases McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
2
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 2, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins