Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Sep
24
2018
“Big Data” Claims Meet Mayo/Alice Rule Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
3
2013
Deposit of Biological Material – Impact on Validity of Priority Claim Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
3
2015
Ariosa v. Sequenom – Cert. Denied Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
18
2019
Split Federal Circuit Panel Holds That Method of Medical Treatment Claims are Patent Eligible Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
23
2013
Marks & Clerk Releases Life Sciences 2013 Report Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
6
2013
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Publishes Trial Transcript from First Covered Business Method Patent Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
7
2023
The Tyranny of Large Numbers: Their Grip on s. 102 Inquiries Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
7
2019
Athena III – Should the Discovery of a Naturally-Occurring Correlation Encompass Recognition of its Practical Utility? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
6
2023
China’s National People’s Congress Releases Translation of Criminal Law Including IP Provisions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
19
2013
Versata: The Double Secret “Technical Effect” Standard Strikes Again Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
15
2024
China’s Supreme People’s Court Sets Low FRAND Rate in Another OPPO Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
19
2024
Huawei U.S. Patent Grants Drop 24% in 2023; BOE Drops Out of the Top 10 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
9
2013
New Zealand Takes a Traditional Approach to Software Patents Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
27
2019
Nalproprion v. Actavis: WDR met by Substantially Equivalent Claim Elements(?) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
27
2013
100+ Innovative American Businesses and Organizations Send Letter to Congress Opposing Expansion of America Invents Act’s “Covered Business Method Patent” Program Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
20
2024
Chinese Copyright Registrations Up 40% in 2023 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
2
2013
The Unacknowledged Role of Section 112 in the Myriad Decisions Re: Patent Eligibility of Genomic DNA Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
15
2024
France’s Arkema S.A. Sues Shanghai Huayi Group Co., Ltd. for 430 Million RMB Patent Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
16
2020
Trump Signs Economic and Trade Agreement with China Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
22
2020
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Top 10 Intellectual Property Cases for 2019 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
12
2014
PTO (Patent and Trademark Office) section 101 Forum – Thumbs Down on Practitioners Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
5
2016
Rapid Litigation v. CellzDirect – A Break in the Section 101 Wall Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
14
2020
Netac Wins Patent Infringement Case Against Micron for USB Drives Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
12
2020
China’s Patent Application Filings Continue Upsurge Surpassing 2019 Year-on-Year Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
25
2020
Huawei Remains Top Corporate Patentee in China in H1 2020 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
27
2016
Patent Infringement: Method Requiring Physical Action Not Claiming Abstract Idea Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
4
2020
China’s Yaohai District Market Supervision Bureau Issues 20 Million RMB Fine for Trademark Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2016
Patent Office Releases Comments on Standards for Patent Eligibility Examination Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins