Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Jan
3
2020
CNIPA Announces Amended Patent Guidelines for Patent Applications Covering AI and Blockchain Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
3
2024
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases Summary of the Supreme People’s Court’s Annual Report on Legal Application in Intellectual Property Cases (2023) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
14
2024
China’s State Administration for Market Regulation Releases the Top 10 Typical Cases of Intellectual Property Enforcement in 2023 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
29
2014
Natural Product Eligibility Guidelines: Isolated DNA and the “Hand of Man” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
2
2014
In re Bergstrom – A Lost Precedent That Should Be “Found” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
14
2014
Lex Machina’s 2013 Patent Litigation Report Shows Disparity Between Litigated Patents and those under PTAB Review Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
17
2014
Natural Products Eligibility Guidance – Post-Forum Comments Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
24
2020
China Issues Ruling in First 5G Criminal Intellectual Property Law Case Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
10
2020
China’s Supreme People’s Court Rules Customer Lists are Not Trade Secrets Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
2
2014
More Questions Than Answers from the Patent and Trademark Office (PTO) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
20
2020
Jiangsu Punishes Chinese Patent Agency for Patent Subject Matter Conflict Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
23
2020
Patent Marking: The Proper Method to Display Protection Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
4
2020
AAM v. Neapco: Method of Manufacturing Claim Gets the 101 Hook(e) Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
10
2020
China’s Qiaodan Sports Loses in Attempt to Enforce Michael Jordan Trademarks Against Amazon Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
20
2017
Transubstantiation of a Machine into an Abstract Idea Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
4
2014
Planet Bingo, LLC v. VKGS LLC: Bingo Invention Fails Abstract Idea Test Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
4
2020
China’s Operation Blue Sky Patent Attorney Rectification Campaign Bears Fruit Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
9
2020
Immunex v. Sanofi-Aventis – The “Mystery Dance” of Claim Construction Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Nov
30
2020
Vectura v. GlaxoSmithKline – How to Keep Process Limitations out of Composition Claims Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
24
2014
Section 101 at AIPLA - American Intellectual Property Law Association Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Mar
19
2021
Shanxi Fines 7 Chinese Intellectual Property Firms for Unauthorized Practice of Law Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
19
2017
Just When You Thought Things Couldn’t Get Worse Via Application Of 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
22
2021
China’s Supreme People’s Court Releases 5-Year Intellectual Property Judicial Protection Plan Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
3
2017
Honeywell International, Inc. v. Mexichem Amanco Holdings – Revenge of the Chemist Judges II Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
16
2021
Beijing Intellectual Property Court Affirms Jaguar Land Rover’s Win Against Landwind for Copying Evoque Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
20
2015
Promega v. Life Technologies – “Too Much Of Nothing?” re: Patent Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Aug
21
2017
Amazon 1-Click Patent About to Expire Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jul
14
2021
First Generic Declarations Published on China’s New Patent Linkage System Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins