Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
May
6
2016
Defend Trade Secrets Act: Notice Requirement Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
6
2016
An Overview of the USTR’s 2016 Special 301 Report on the State of IPR in Russia Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
6
2016
New (and Improved?) PTO Guidelines on Biotech Patent-Eligibility Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
6
2016
International Trade Commission Invalidates Patents to Fitness Monitoring Systems as Ineligible under § 101 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
6
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 6, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
6
2016
Explaining the Provisions of the Defend Trade Secrets Act Mintz
May
6
2016
Do the New PTAB Rules Drive You to Drink? IMS Legal Strategies
May
5
2016
Copyright Basics for Startups and Entrepreneurs Odin, Feldman & Pittleman, P.C.
May
5
2016
Do You Really Think Supreme Court Had This in Mind… Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
5
2016
Rah! Rah! Sis Boom Bah! Supreme Court to Decide Whether Copyright Act Protects Cheerleader Uniform Designs Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
May
5
2016
Hail Mary to U.S. Supreme Court? Owner of REDSKINS Marks Petitions for Hearing on Constitutionality of Section 2(a) of Lanham Act Katten
May
5
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 5, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
5
2016
US Employers Take Notice: Defend Trade Secrets Act Contains Noteworthy New Provisions Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
5
2016
Mobotix Corp. v. ComCam International: Final Written Decision Finding Some Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2015-00093 Faegre Drinker
May
5
2016
Are Drug Prices Really Too High? Foley & Lardner LLP
May
5
2016
New Federal Legislation to Assist Employers in Protecting Trade Secrets Godfrey & Kahn S.C.
May
4
2016
New Federal Trade Secret Act: What Employers Need to Know Holland & Hart LLP
May
4
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 4, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
4
2016
District Court Applies Mayo To Treatment Claims But Denies Motion To Dismiss BMS Keytruda Litigation Foley & Lardner LLP
May
3
2016
Bio-rad Laboratories v. California Institute of Tech: Final Written Decision Finding No Inconsistency between Expert Testimony and Earlier Paper by Same Expert IPR2015-00009 Faegre Drinker
May
3
2016
US Supreme Court to Review Standard for Copyright Protection of Clothing Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
May
3
2016
“Very Extraordinary Animal” Argued at Supreme Court in Patent Case under AIA Review Armstrong Teasdale
May
3
2016
Patent Applications: Prior Art and Continuation-in-Part Claims Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
3
2016
In Rare Move, PTAB Grants Motion to Amend in IPR Proceeding Armstrong Teasdale
May
3
2016
Telit Wireless Solutions v. M2M Solutions: Decision Partially Granting Institution Based on References Considered During Prosecution IPR2016-00055 Faegre Drinker
May
3
2016
Patent Litigation: Not Obvious to Combine References for Person of Ordinary Skill in Art (POSITA) Mintz
May
3
2016
Hughes Network Sys. v. California Institute of Tech: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable and Real Party in Interest Satisfied IPR2015-00059 Faegre Drinker
May
3
2016
Defend Trade Secrets Act. It’s Coming: What You Need to Know Dickinson Wright PLLC
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins