Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Apr
18
2016
Jazz Xyrem + Valproate Patent Claims Avoid IPR Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
16
2016
BioDelivery Sciences Int’l, Inc. v. Monosol RX, LLC, Collateral Estoppel Based on Ex Parte Reexam Found Not Applicable in Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Apr
15
2016
Key Lessons from Patent Litigation for Drafting and Prosecuting Utility Patent Applications Mintz
Apr
15
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 15, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
14
2016
IBG LLC, et al. v. Trading Techs. Int’l, Inc.: Extension of Time to Submit Supplemental Evidence Denied Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
EU Updates Community Trade Mark System, Warns of Potential Imposters Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Apr
14
2016
GoPro v. Contour IP Holding: Denying Motion to Submit Declaration as Supplemental Information Where Declaration Constituted Supplemental Evidence IPR2015-01078 Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
Core Survival v. S&S Precision: Denial of Petitioner’s Rehearing Request for Raising New Unpatentability Arguments PGR2015-00022 Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
Square v. Protegrity Corp: CBM2014-00182 Challenged Claims Unpatentable Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
USPTO Publishes Substantive Changes to PTAB Rules Polsinelli PC
Apr
14
2016
Coalition for Affordable Drugs v. Acorda Therapeutics: IPR2015-00720 Request for Rehearing Denied Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 14, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
14
2016
Genband Management Services v. Metaswitch Networks: IPR2015-01457 Request for Rehearing Granted Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
Dave Kappos Calls for Abolition of Section 101 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Apr
14
2016
Virginia Court Can't Review Policy Behind Patent Term Adjustment Statute Foley & Lardner LLP
Apr
13
2016
Stylized Trademark Registration for Specific Term can Provide Same Level of Protection as Standard Word Trademark Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Apr
13
2016
ITC To Consider Whether Laches Is Available Defense In Section 337 Investigations Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
13
2016
ITC Adopts Summary Determination of Section 101 Invalidity In Tracking Devices and Finds Asserted Patent Claims Invalid Under Section 112 In Brewing Capsules Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
13
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 13, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
12
2016
Rise of Machines: DATA vs. Borg Collective Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Apr
12
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 12, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
11
2016
Euramax Int’l v. Invisaflow: Stipulated Motion to Extend Time for Preliminary Response in Light of Settlement Negotiations Denied IPR2016-00423 Faegre Drinker
Apr
11
2016
Valuable but Unpatentable: Global Business IP Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Apr
11
2016
Bottom of Ninth Disclosure of New Damages Theory Warrants More Discovery Proskauer Rose LLP
Apr
11
2016
USPTO Issues New Rules for Patent Office Trials Hunton Andrews Kurth
Apr
11
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – April 11, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Apr
11
2016
Actifio v. Delphix Corp: Evidence Supporting Prior Art Status of Reference Permitted with Reply in Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2015-00052 Faegre Drinker
Apr
11
2016
Genetic Technologies Affirms Ariosa/Myriad With Introduction By Sequenom Petition for Cert. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins