Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Mar
31
2016
Unenforceability Due to Client Failure to Correct Counsel’s Misrepresentations to PTO McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
In Determining Whether to Apply Intervening Rights, Courts Must Account for Differences Between Claim Construction Standards McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Inconsistent and Confusing Specification Language Does Not Support Broad Claim Construction McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Price Tag for Patent Invalidity Ruling in Inequitable Conduct Case is $26 Million McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Reformulated OxyContin Patents Invalid McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Absent Contemporaneous Objection to Order for Single Trial on Subset of Claims, No Due Process Violation McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Institutes 17 Inter Partes Reviews for TCL Communication Technology Holdings Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
30
2016
Rosebud LMS Inc. v. Adobe Systems Inc.: Pre-Issuance Damages Possible Only If You “Know” About the Published Application McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
20-Year Zoltek Litigation Continues: Federal Circuit Reverses CFC Invalidity Ruling on Written Description, Obviousness Grounds McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
TriReme Med., LLC v. AngioScore, Inc.: Stent Contract Collapses Standing Argument McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Trivascular, Inc. v. Samuels: Even the “Broadest Reasonable Interpretation” Has Limits McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – March 30, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Mar
30
2016
Synopsys, Inc. v. Mentor Graphics Corp.: Decision to Institute IPR Need Not Be Binary McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Eon Corp. IP Holdings LLC v. Silver Spring Networks, Inc.: “Plain and Ordinary Meaning” Must Be Tethered to Invention Described in Specification McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Nike, Inc. v. Adidas AG: Federal Circuit Remands PTAB’s Denial of Motion to Amend in IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
30
2016
Patent Agent-Client Privilege: Smartclause? IMS Legal Strategies
Mar
30
2016
Great West Casualty Co. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Disclaimed Claims May Be Disregarded in Considering CBM Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
Preliminary Injunction on Flameless Candle Extinguished McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
Timing Is Everything – Meeting the One-Year Filing Deadline for IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
Yet Another Bite at this Apple: Damages in Design Patent Cases McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
The Estoppel Effects of IPR May Be Significantly Limited
Mar
29
2016
T.T.A.B. Emphasizes the Fame of the Movie ‘Jaws’ in Its Refusal to Register a Cooking Show’s Mark Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Mar
29
2016
PPC Broadband, Inc. v. Corning Optical Commc’n RF, LLC: Presumptions Can Apply in Inter Partes PTAB Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
PTAB Disinclined to Tailor Protective Orders or Interfere with Protective Orders Issued in Parallel Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
Expediting Patent Prosecution in Brazil Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Mar
29
2016
Foreign IP Litigation Does Not Defeat Presumption of Laches McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
The Smart Phone Patent Saga Continues: Apple Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., et al. McDermott Will & Emery
Mar
29
2016
First Amendment Prevents Right of Publicity Claim Arising from Film About “Issues of Public Nature” McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins