Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
27
2016
No More Monkey Business in Copyright Law Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
26
2016
Massachusetts: Wisp of a Possibility of Gas Kit Lawsuit May Establish Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
26
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 26, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
25
2016
You Can’t Spell “Pressurized Collection Vessel” Without “Collection”: Akzo Nobel Coatings, Inc. v. Dow Chem. Co. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Agilent Technologies, Inc. v. Waters Technologies Corp.: New Party Has No Cause of Action to Appeal PTAB Decision McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
TradeStation Group Securities v. Trading Tech Intl: Covered Business Method Patent Review Instituted CBM2015-00161 Faegre Drinker
Feb
25
2016
Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien LP: Same Board Panel May Institute and Finally Decide AIA Review McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
USPTO “Forecloses” on Mortgage Processing Patent under Alice Mintz
Feb
25
2016
Pfizer, Inc. v. Lee: Time Between Original and Corrected Restriction Requirement Nets No Further Patent Term Adjustment McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 25, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
25
2016
Avid Technologies, Inc. v. Harmonic, Inc.: Reversal of Narrow Claim Construction Results in Satisfaction of Claim Element McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Glass Half Full for Russian Federation Successor’s Stolichnaya Infringement Saga McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Trying to Outhustle a Permanent Injunction: LFP IP, LLC v. Hustler Cincinnati, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
CBM Review Not a Venue for Review of Contractual and Tortious Disputes McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Turkish Intellectual Property Court Rules on the Patentability of Genes and Other Nucleic Acid Sequences Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
25
2016
J.P. Morgan Chase LLC V. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: CBM Jurisdiction Survives Abandonment of CBM Claims McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Post-Grant Review Estoppel Applies on Claim-by-Claim Basis McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
In Obviousness Analysis Loss of Benefit Is Not the Same as Inoperable McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Previously Denied Section 101 Defense Rendered Meritorious by the Supreme Court’s Alice Decision McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Multiplying Claim Requirements After Trial Makes Things Impermissibly Complex McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Attorneys’ Fee Award Cannot Be Enhanced to Deter Misconduct McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Federal Circuit Backs Finding of Inequitable Conduct in Reexamination of Prosthetics Patent Mintz
Feb
25
2016
PTAB Exercises Exclusive Jurisdiction Over Patents Involved in IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Federal Circuit Precedents on Domestic and International Patent Exhaustion Principles Remain Unchanged McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2016
Patent Term Adjustment Versus Double Patenting Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
25
2016
Rosa Parks Name and Likeness Free for Use? McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
“Supplemental Evidence” Versus “Supplemental Information” in Patent Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
PTAB: On Second Thought, Your IPR Is Instituted McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins