Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
24
2016
PTAB: On Second Thought, Your IPR Is Instituted McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
In Wake of Dynamic Drinkware, PTAB Rejects Prior Art Due to Petitioner’s Failure to Establish Earlier Priority Dates McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
Three Most Important Things at PTAB: Rules, Rules, Rules McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
First Complaint Triggers One Year Time Bar for IPR Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
No Institution Based Solely on Unsupported Expert Testimony McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
Re-Registration of a Domain Name Constitutes “Registration” Under the ACPA McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
Monkey See, Monkey Sue Doesn’t Fly Under U.S. Copyright Law Mintz
Feb
24
2016
Copyright Act Statute of Limitations: Waiting to File Makes No (50) Cents McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
24
2016
Dr. Reddy’s Laboratories v. Galderma Lab: Institution Denied Where Patent Entitled to Earlier Priority Date IPR2015-01778 Faegre Drinker
Feb
24
2016
Mitchell Intl v. Audatex North America: Final Written Decision Finding All Claims Unpatentable Subject Matter CBM2014-00171 Faegre Drinker
Feb
24
2016
Ambiguous Allegations, Lack Of Imminent Harm, And Delay In Taking Action Doom Request For Temporary Restraining Order Epstein Becker & Green, P.C.
Feb
24
2016
Window of Opportunity for CTM Owners in the EU to Refine Scope of Their Marks Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Feb
23
2016
First Data Corp v. Coqui Tech: Decision Denying Institution Where Petitioner Does Not Provide Adequate Structure Corresponding To Alleged Means-Plus-Function Limitations IPR2015-01667 Faegre Drinker
Feb
23
2016
Ohio Willow Wood’s Appeal of IC Finding Goes Up In Smoke Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
23
2016
NHK Seating of America v. Lear Corp: Final Written Decision Finding Most Of The Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01200 Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
Shenzhen Huiding Tech v. Synaptics: Denying-in-Part Institution on Incorporation by Reference Grounds IPR2015-01739 Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
TRW Automotive v. MAGNA Electronics: Evidence Excluded For Insufficient Evidence To Support Finding That It Is What Proponent Claims It Is IPR2014-01347 Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
Hilti v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corporation: Authorizing Motion for Additional Discovery as to Documents Held by Third Parties IPR2015-01164; IPR2015-01165; IPR2015-01166 Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
CHUMS and CROAKIES v. CABLZ: No Nexus When Commercial Success Is Dependent On Element In Prior Art IPR2014-01240 Faegre Drinker
Feb
22
2016
New Year Trademark Audit: Time for Reflection and Renewal Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
22
2016
Out With the Old, In With the New re: Company Rebranding Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
22
2016
Federal Circuit Employs Phillips Claim Construction to Measure Claims Amended in Reexamination for Possible Intervening Rights Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
19
2016
Massachusetts Jury Verdict Stands After Court Ruling on Laches Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
19
2016
The En Banc Federal Circuit Holds That Patent Rights Are Not Exhausted by Prior Restricted Sales or by Foreign Sales Hunton Andrews Kurth
Feb
18
2016
Federal Circuit Rules Its Precedents on Domestic and International Patent Exhaustion Principles Not Changed by Supreme Court Cases McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
18
2016
Federal Circuit Sanctions PTO’s Authority To Institute IPR On A Claim-By-Claim Basis in Synopsis v. Mentor Graphics Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
18
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 18, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
18
2016
Sandoz Asks Supreme Court To Reverse Biosimilar Decision Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins