Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
10
2016
First Monoclonal Antibody Biosimilar in U.S. Gets One Step Closer to FDA Approval Mintz
Feb
10
2016
PTAB Institutes Trial On Previously Challenged Cabilly Patent
Feb
10
2016
Mylan Pharmaceuticals and Amneal Pharm v. Yeda Research & Development: Motion to Submit Supplemental Information Was Granted For Public Documents But Denied For Confidential Documents IPR2015-00643, 644, 830 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
Crestron Electronics v. Intuitive Building Controls: Petitioner Correctly Designated As Supplemental Information Exhibits Offered To Support Contention That References Are Prior Art IPR2015-01379 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
NESTLÉ Healthcare Nutrition v. Steuben Foods: Request for Additional Discovery Denied Where Requesting Sales Agreements To Prove Privity IPR2015-00195, 249 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
Google v. Visual Real Estate: Motion to Exclude Denied For Not Explaining Adequately Its Objections to Admissibility IPR2014-01339 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
Black Swamp IP, LLC v. VirnetX Inc.: Decision on Institution Granting Joinder IPR2016-00167 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
Lumentum Holdings, Inc. et al. v. Capella Photonics, Inc.: Order Granting Motion to Compel IPR2015-00731 Faegre Drinker
Feb
10
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 10, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
10
2016
TRW Automotive U.S. LLC v. Magna Electronics: Request for Additional Discovery Denied for Not Showing It Would Be Necessary In The Interests of Justice IPR2015-00436 Faegre Drinker
Feb
9
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 9, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
9
2016
Oracle Corp. v. Crossroads Systems: Final Written Decision finding Four-Month Period of Inactivity Sufficient to Defeat Patent Owner’s Claim of Diligence IPR2014-01209 Faegre Drinker
Feb
9
2016
Federal Circuit Finds No "Way" To Support Doctrine Of Equivalents Foley & Lardner LLP
Feb
8
2016
Obama Launches Cancer Moonshot Task Force – But Where’s Patent Power? Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
8
2016
He’s got 99 Problems, But a Breach Might NOT be One Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
8
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 8, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
8
2016
Groundhog Day: Declaring Impending Death of Massachusetts Noncompetes Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Feb
8
2016
Foreign Filing Restrictions and Licenses in Russia – Part 4 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
7
2016
Tietex Int’l, Ltd. v. Precision Fabrics Group, Inc., Inherency Not Established in Final Written Decision Finding Claims Not Unpatentable IPR2014-01248 Faegre Drinker
Feb
6
2016
BMC Medical, 3B Products, and 3B Medical v. ResMed - Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-01196 Faegre Drinker
Feb
5
2016
Website HTML Is Copyrightable, Even If Look and Feel Is Not Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
5
2016
Apple, Inc. v. VirnetX Inc - Decision Confirming that Section 315(b) Time Limit Does Not Apply to Request for Joinder IPR2016-00062 Faegre Drinker
Feb
5
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 5, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
5
2016
Coalition for Affordable Drugs V LLC v. Biogen International GmbH - Denying Rehearing of Decision Not to Institute Based on Lack of Showing of Abuse of Discretion IPR2015-01086 Faegre Drinker
Feb
4
2016
Design Patent Case Digest: Ethicon Endo-Surgery, Inc. v. Covidien, Inc. Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
4
2016
Lupin Pharmaceuticals v. Senju Pharm: Review Instituted and Joinder Granted IPR2015-01871 Faegre Drinker
Feb
4
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 4, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
4
2016
High Stakes Race Between Apple and VirnetX: Will PTAB Trump Texas Jury's Award of $326.5M? Foley & Lardner LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins