Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jan
12
2016
Federal Circuit Hears Argument on Personal Jurisdiction in Two Hatch-Waxman Appeals Mintz
Jan
12
2016
Ardagh Glass v. Culchrome: Denying Request for Rehearing Decision on Institution IPR2015-00943 Faegre Drinker
Jan
12
2016
Indoor Skydiving Germany GMBH v. iFLY Holdings: Denying Request for Rehearing Regarding Public Availability of Prior Art IPR2015-01272 Faegre Drinker
Jan
12
2016
CaptionCall v. Ultratec: Denial Of Request for Rehearing Of Final Written Decision That Alleged Secondary Considerations Without Sufficient Evidence IPR2013-00549 Faegre Drinker
Jan
12
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 12, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
12
2016
Foreign Patent Filing Restrictions and Licenses in U.S. – Part 1 Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
12
2016
UK Employment Aspects of New EU Trade Secrets Directive Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Jan
12
2016
Losing Competing Property Not Teaching Away Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
11
2016
Amazon to Control Delivery by Drone? Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Jan
11
2016
Federal Circuit Rules Lanham Act’s Disparagement Bar Unconstitutional, Creating Circuit Split ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jan
11
2016
Jury Awards Miller Over $74 Million For Caterpillar’s Misappropriation and Misuse of Confidential Information and Trade Secrets ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jan
11
2016
Unified Patents v. Olivistar: Decision Denying Institution Where Every Element Of Challenged Claims Not Identified In Prior Art IPR2015-01217 Faegre Drinker
Jan
11
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 11, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
10
2016
Federal Circuit Orders IPR Remand On Board's Treatment Of Evidence Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
10
2016
AVX Corporation v. Greatbatch: Final Written Decision Denying Motion to Amend IPR2014-01361 Faegre Drinker
Jan
8
2016
Bungie v. Worlds: Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-01325 Faegre Drinker
Jan
8
2016
ServiceNow v. BMC Softward: Authorization Denied to File Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2015-01176; -01211 Faegre Drinker
Jan
8
2016
Square v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Eligible for CBM Review and Unpatentable Under Section 101 CBM2014-00156 Faegre Drinker
Jan
8
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 8, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
8
2016
January 8, 2016 -- Biologics and Biosimilars Bits and Bytes Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
7
2016
Federal Circuit Backs PTAB Decision Curtailing A Party's Use Of "Supplemental" Information Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
7
2016
Judge Gilstrap Awards Section 285 Fees Where Plaintiff’s Section 101 Positions Cross Threshold of Exceptionality Mintz
Jan
7
2016
Share Your Patent Quality Pet Peeves with the USPTO Foley & Lardner LLP
Jan
7
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 7, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
6
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 6, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
5
2016
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 5, 2016 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
5
2016
Seagate Technology v. Enova Tech Corp: Nexus Between Secondary Consideration And Claims Was Not Sufficient IPR2014-01449 Faegre Drinker
Jan
5
2016
I Think Therefore I Am … a Patent IMS Legal Strategies
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins