Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jan
1
2016
K.J. Pretech Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLC: Motion for Additional Discovery Authorized Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
District Judge Finds Some Claims Precluded, Others Not – By A Degree Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
31
2015
ServiceNow, Inc. v. BMC Software, Inc.: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
Top Patent Law Stories In 2015 Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
31
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 31, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
31
2015
Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies v. Premium Genetics (UK) Ltd: Institution of Post-Grant Review of a Patent Issuing from a Transition Application Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
Hewlett-Packard Co. v. U.S. Philips Corp., et al.: Order Denying Authorization to File Reply to Preliminary Response Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
Altaire Pharmaceuticals v. Paragon Bioteck: Decision Denying Institution In Part Where Petitioner Had Not Alleged Unpatentability With Sufficient Particularlity Faegre Drinker
Dec
30
2015
Contract Corner: Drafting to Protect Your IP Rights in Licensor’s Bankruptcy Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Dec
30
2015
Use of Priority Denial to Subject Apparent "Pre-AIA" Patents to PGR: Inguran v. Premium Genetics Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
30
2015
TTAB Finds MEAT CANDY to be Too Sweet Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
30
2015
Year End 2015 Update - gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
30
2015
Square v. REM Holdings 3: Partially Granted Request For Rehearing Of Final Written Decision IPR2014-00312 Faegre Drinker
Dec
29
2015
Review of 2015 Federal Circuit Decisions Addressing IPR Claim Construction and Procedural Issues Mintz
Dec
29
2015
Starbucks Corporation v. Ameranth: Instituting Review of Challenged Claims CBM2015-00091 Faegre Drinker
Dec
29
2015
Can the California Secretary Of State Reject Disparaging Business Entity Names? Allen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP
Dec
29
2015
Don't Blame Patents For High Drug Prices
Dec
28
2015
Five Tips for Retaining Employees in Competitive Business Climate Foley & Lardner LLP
Dec
28
2015
Actifio v. Delphix Corp: Authorized To Cross-Examine After Declaration Was Filed Regardless Of Service Date IPR2015-00014 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
Wegner to Lee: Four-Step Program to Resolve Section 101 IP Questions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
28
2015
Mangrove Partners Master Fund v. VIRNETX: Additional Discovery Regarding Real-Party-In-Interest Denied IPR2015-01046 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
Lowe's Home Centers v. Maureen Reddy: Authorization To File Motion For Late Submission of Supplemental Information After Oral Argument IPR2015-00306 Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
MotionPoint Corp v. TransPerfect Global: Reply to Preliminary Response Authorized To Address Standing CBM2015-00168, 178 Faegre Drinker
Dec
25
2015
The USPTO’s Holiday Gift: Late Filings Allowed! Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Dec
25
2015
Massachusetts Court Clears Patent Prosecutors of Malpractice Claims Arising From Representation of Clients in Same Technology Area Proskauer Rose LLP
Dec
25
2015
Settle with All Stakeholders Before Trying to Terminate an IPR: Qualcomm Inc. v. Bandspeed, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Dec
25
2015
Factual Inc. v. Locata LBS LLC: Granting Motion to Strike Objections for Being Untimely Faegre Drinker
Dec
24
2015
Federal Circuit Limits the Safe Harbor Provision and the Scope of § 271(g) McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins