Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Oct
8
2015
Praxair Distribution, Inc. v. INO Therapeutics, LLC, Granting Institution Despite Use of References Previously Considered During Prosecution IPR2015-00893 Faegre Drinker
Oct
8
2015
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Affinity Labs of Texas, Final Written Decision That All Instituted Claims Invalid IPR2014-00407 Faegre Drinker
Oct
7
2015
Apple, Inc. v. Personal Web Technologies: Request for Rehearing of Final Written Decision Denied IPR2013-00596 Faegre Drinker
Oct
7
2015
gTLD Sunrise Periods Now Open: October 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
7
2015
The Who, What, and "Wares" of Wearable Technology - Protect Your Morphing Products Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
7
2015
Ch-Ch-Ch-Ch-Changes: USPTO Pilot Program on Changing Technology Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
7
2015
Avocent Huntsville Corp and Liebert Corporation v. Cyber Switching Patents, LLC: Board Explains Differences and Limitations on Supplemental Evidence and Supplemental Information IPR2015-00690 Faegre Drinker
Oct
7
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 7, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
7
2015
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Hitachi Automotive Systems, LTD., and Hyundai Motor America: Denying Motion to Submit Supplemental Information Attempting to Change the Type of Evidence Relied On in the Petition IPR2014-01548 Faegre Drinker
Oct
7
2015
Google Inc., Samsung Electronics v. Microfrafx, LLC: Motion to Amend Denied For Failure to Explain Patentability Over Prior Art of Record IPR2014-00532 Faegre Drinker
Oct
7
2015
RPX Corporation v. Applications in Internet Time: Motion for Additional Discovery Into Real Parties-in-Interest Authorized IPR2015-01750 Faegre Drinker
Oct
7
2015
USPTO Extends Pilot Programs for Accelerating Examination Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
7
2015
Dunkin’ Donuts: Your Munchkin Is Showing IMS Legal Strategies
Oct
6
2015
Qualtrics v. OpinionLab: Final Written Decision Holding Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00421 Faegre Drinker
Oct
6
2015
Hi-Tech Accuses Dynamic of Trademark Infringement and False Claims of Steroid Powered Products Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
6
2015
IGB Automotive and I.G. Bauerhin GmbH v. Gentherm GmbH: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable Where Inventors do not Allege Conception of all Limitations Prior to Petitioner’s Reference IPR2014-00664 Faegre Drinker
Oct
6
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 6, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
6
2015
Beware Reexamination Amendments Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
5
2015
Endo Pharmaceuticals v. Depomed: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00652 Faegre Drinker
Oct
5
2015
Jordan FDA Issues a Guideline for the Registration of Biosimilars Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
5
2015
Achates Reference Publishing v. Apple: Federal Circuit Appeal in IPR2013-00080, 00081 Faegre Drinker
Oct
5
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 5, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
5
2015
New Jersey High Court Clarifies Disgorgement as Remedy for Breach of Duty of Loyalty Jackson Lewis P.C.
Oct
4
2015
Fujitsu Semiconductor Ltd., et al. v. Zond, LLC - Final Written Decision Finding Reference Qualified as Prior Art Based on Library Catalog IPR2014-00821 Faegre Drinker
Oct
3
2015
BABY TREND, INC., DENNY TSAI, and BETTY TSAI v. WONDERLAND NURSERYGOODS CO., LTD. Granting In Part Additional Discovery Regarding Secondary Indicia IPR2015-00841 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2015
MotionPoint Corporation v. TransPerfect Global: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable CBM2014-00060 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2015
Apple v. Samsung Part IV: The Injunction May Not Be Dead Mintz
Oct
2
2015
PNC Bank N.A. v. SECURE AXCESS: Board Uses Discretion to Deny Institution of Petition That is Redundant to Prior Petition CBM2015-00039 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins