Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Oct
2
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 2, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
2
2015
LG ELECTRONICS v. ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES: Institution Denied With Insufficient Evidence of Public Accessibility of Printed Publications IPR2015-00329 Faegre Drinker
Oct
2
2015
Practice What You Preach - Yoga Remains Uncopyrightable, for Now Holland & Hart LLP
Oct
1
2015
Rights of Publicity: A Potentially Catastrophic Pitfall for the Unwary Marketer as told by Jordan v. Dominick’s Finer Foods Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Oct
1
2015
Coalition for Affordable Drugs VI v. Celgene Corporation: Denying Motion for Sanctions IPR2015-01092 Faegre Drinker
Oct
1
2015
Standing Conferred Only to a Privy of the Petitioner McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2015
Insurance Form Processing Qualifies As A “Financial Service or Product” for CBM Review McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2015
Licensing Agent Has Standing to Bring Copyright Infringement Suit re: Stock Photography McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 1, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
1
2015
Inline Plastics Corp. v. Easypak, LLC: Claims Not Limited to Preferred Embodiment McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2015
Patentee’s Admission that Certain Technology Is Prior Art, Without More, Is Not a Ground of Unpatentability in IPR Petition McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2015
PTAB Continues to Evolve Its Covered Business Method Patent Jurisprudence McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2015
An Evaluation of Secondary Meaning Can Consider Both Parties’ Use of the Mark McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2015
Solution for Evolution in the Trademark Arena Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Oct
1
2015
The Complications of Copyrighted Images in the Yellow Pages McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2015
Divided Infringement Between Doctor And Patient Foley & Lardner LLP
Oct
1
2015
Thirty Years’ Use of Mark is Not Enough to Prove Acquired Distinctiveness if Evidence is Insufficient McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2015
Ray Charles Foundation Can Challenge Heirs’ Attempt to Reclaim Copyrights McDermott Will & Emery
Oct
1
2015
PTAB Clarifies Requirements for Claim Amendments McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
Grrrr . . . Paw Print Trademarks Can Co-Exist McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
Progressive Obtains No Insurance at Federal Circuit McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
Petitioner Wins Uncontested Alice Fight McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
Enablement: Multiple Measurement Methods Can Lead to the Same Result McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
Standing Requires the Transfer of All Substantial Rights, Regardless of Whether a Patent Is Expired McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
Special Circumstances Justify USPTO Release of Confidential Information About Pending Patent Applications McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
Google’s Strategic Purchase of Rights and Counterclaim Do Not Survive Delaware’s Statute of Limitations McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
Patent Owner’s Licensing Program Was Fatal to Its Patent Infringement Theory McDermott Will & Emery
Sep
30
2015
Federal Circuit: PTAB’s Claim Construction Standard Is BRI, but Sometimes with an Obligation McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins