Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Sep
11
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 11, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
11
2015
Comparing U.S. and Australian Provisional Patent Applications Mintz
Sep
11
2015
Daifuku America Corp. v. Murata Machinery: Denying Motion to Apply for Subpoena for Failure to Provide Basis for Cross-Examination of Translator IPR2015-00083; IPR2015-00085; IPR2015-00088 Faegre Drinker
Sep
11
2015
Imports that Induce Subsequent Infringement are (Again) Subject to the Authority of the ITC Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
10
2015
Clinical Trials As Prior Art: PTAB Denies Bass IPR Petition With Only A "Hope" of Efficacy Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
10
2015
Divisional Applications and the Patent Prosecution Highway Program between U.S. and Mexico Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
10
2015
Daifuku America Corp. v. Murata Machinery: Denying Patent Owner’s Motion for Additional Discovery Regarding Secondary Considerations and Real Parties-in-Interest Faegre Drinker
Sep
10
2015
Protecting the Brand: Jury Awards $8.9 Million Verdict in Favor of Michael Jordan ArentFox Schiff LLP
Sep
10
2015
TRW Automotive US v. Magna Electronics Inc: Final Written Decision Confirming All Challenged Claims IPR2014-00251 Faegre Drinker
Sep
10
2015
Google Inc. v. ART+COM Innovationpool GmbH: Denying Institution When References Were Not Shown to Be “Publicly Accessible” IPR2015-00788, 789 Faegre Drinker
Sep
10
2015
Denying Authorization to File Motion to Terminate Asserting Lack of Case or Controversy Standing in Westlake Services v. Credit Acceptance Corporation Faegre Drinker
Sep
9
2015
Smarter China Trademark Owners Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Sep
9
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 9, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
9
2015
Unverferth Manufacturing v. J&M Manufacturing Co: Final Written Decision Finding All Claims Unpatentable Over Evidence of Secondary Considerations IPR2014-00758 Faegre Drinker
Sep
9
2015
Apple Inc. v. ContentGuard Holdings, Inc.: Denying Institution Where Claim Interpretation Would Render Claim Terms Superfluous IPR2015-00353 Faegre Drinker
Sep
9
2015
Cambridge Associates, LLC v. Capital Dynamics: All Challenged Claims Found To Be Drawn To Unpatentable Subject Matter CBM2014-00079 Faegre Drinker
Sep
9
2015
Coalition for Affordable Drugs V LLC v. Biogen MA Inc.: Denying Institution Where Prior Art Merely Hopes a Certain Result Will be Useful Faegre Drinker
Sep
8
2015
Eizo Corporation v. Barco N.V.: One Year Bar Triggered By Complaint Asserting the Reissue Patent, Not the Surrendered Patent IPR2014-00358 Faegre Drinker
Sep
8
2015
Sony Corp. of Am. v. Network-1 Techs: Denying Institution where Claimed Invention Merely Capable of Use with a Financial Service CBM2015-00078 Faegre Drinker
Sep
8
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 8, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
8
2015
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., v. Signal IP, Inc.: Institution Denied Where Articulated Reasoning Was Not Provided For Obviousness Ground IPR2015-00968 Faegre Drinker
Sep
8
2015
Esselte Corp. v. Dymo: Assignor Estoppel and Contractual Bar Were Not Found As Defenses Against An IPR Challenge IPR2015-00781 Faegre Drinker
Sep
8
2015
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Boots Bass Tecfidera IPR On The Merits Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
7
2015
Trademark Practitioners Beware: Issue Preclusion May Now Apply to TTAB Findings More Often Than You Think Proskauer Rose LLP
Sep
4
2015
Sandoz Launches First Biosimilar Drug in U.S. Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
4
2015
USPTO Pilot Program: Trademark Registration Owners May Now Be Able To Broaden Their Goods And Services Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
Sep
3
2015
Skimlinks, Inc. and Skimbit, Ltd. v. Linkgine, Inc., Decision Instituting CBM and Granting Motion for Joinder CBM2015-00087 Faegre Drinker
Sep
3
2015
Another Claim Bites the Dust left by Teva v. Sandoz Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins