Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Sep
3
2015
Olympus Medical Systems Corp v. Perfect Surgical Tech: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00233 FWD 20150608 Faegre Drinker
Sep
3
2015
Using Copyright Protection in Architectural Works to Police Unauthorized Photographs Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Sep
3
2015
Update in Amgen v. Sandoz re: Biosimilar Applications Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
3
2015
Federal Circuit Court Finds Dow Claims Clearly Indefinite Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
2
2015
Akamai Technologies, Inc. v. Limelight Networks, Inc.: Federal Circuit brings defines liability for “joint enterprises” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
2
2015
PTAB Requests Additional Briefing On Hedge Fund IPR Questions: A Decision May Be Near Foley & Lardner LLP
Sep
2
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 2, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
2
2015
Trademark Registration Amendments Are Now Allowed (temporarily) for Evolving Technology Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.
Sep
2
2015
MaxLinear, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation: Denying Institution Where the Petition is Substantially the Same as a Previous Petition IPR2015-00591 Faegre Drinker
Sep
2
2015
BLD Services, LLC v. LMK Technologies, LLC: Denying Institution Based on Same or Substantially the Same Prior Art Previously Presented to the Board IPR2015-00723 Faegre Drinker
Sep
2
2015
Apple Inc. v. THX Ltd., IPR2014-00235: Final Written Decision Finding 2 of 3 Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00235 Faegre Drinker
Sep
2
2015
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Norman IP Holdings, LLC, Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00563 Faegre Drinker
Sep
1
2015
Non-Apportioned Damages Awards Can Make Design Patents Highly Valuable Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Sep
1
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 1, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
1
2015
Parsing USPTO Petitions Data Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
31
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – August 31, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Aug
31
2015
Predision Components v. Avx Corp: Petitioner Allowed To Correct Clerical Mistake Of Submitting Unexecuted Declaration IPR2015-01332 Faegre Drinker
Aug
31
2015
When Dismissal Of A Covered Business Method Proceeding Is Not Appropriate Armstrong Teasdale
Aug
31
2015
SAP AMERICA v. LAKSHMI ARUNACHALAM: Final Written Decision Confirming That Limitations Cannot Be Imported From The Specification IPR2014-00413 Faegre Drinker
Aug
31
2015
Getting Serious about Palcohol: Powdered Alcohol Faegre Drinker
Aug
31
2015
Nautilus Standard Sinks Dow Patents Foley & Lardner LLP
Aug
31
2015
Ford Motor Co. v. Paice and Abell Foundation: Denying Institution where Same/Substantially Same Prior Art/Arguments were Previously Presented IPR2015-00767 Faegre Drinker
Aug
31
2015
An Update on Biosimilar Activity in the U.S. Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Aug
30
2015
Direct Infringement Motion to Dismiss Under Form 18 Granted McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
29
2015
PTO Has Broad Discretion in Considering Extraordinary Situations for Patent Term Adjustment McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2015
Filing Serial Lawsuits for Nuisance Settlements May Be “Exceptional” if Improper Intent Established McDermott Will & Emery
Aug
28
2015
What’s in a Name? That Which We Call a Biological Product… Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Aug
28
2015
Federal Circuit Expands Definition of Direct Infringement Hunton Andrews Kurth
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins