Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
23
2015
FTC Issues Updated Guidance on Endorsements Compliance - Federal Trademark Commission Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jun
23
2015
Kyocera Corporation v. Adaptix: Institution Denied Where Petitioner Relied On Disclosure of Challenged Patent IPR2015-00318 Faegre Drinker
Jun
23
2015
Apple v. ContentGuard Holdings: Institution Denied Where Corresponding Structure Not Identified IPR2015-00456 Faegre Drinker
Jun
23
2015
Kimble v. Marvel – Supreme Court Sticks With Brulotte Rule on Royalty Payments Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
23
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 23, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
23
2015
Federal Circuit Reverses Unreasonable PTAB Claim Construction, Upholds Idle Free Standard For Motions To Amend Foley & Lardner LLP
Jun
22
2015
Symantec Corp. v. The Trustees of Columbia University in the City of New York: A purported thesis, without more, is not a printed publication, IPR2015-00370 Faegre Drinker
Jun
22
2015
Getting Tangled in the Web of a Hybrid Royalty Clause Part II: Supreme Court Re-affirms Brulotte Decision Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Jun
22
2015
Federal Circuit Reverses PTAB Decision in IPR Proceeding Mintz
Jun
22
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 22, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
22
2015
Board Limits Multiple IPR Challenges in Samsung Electronics v. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
22
2015
Teva v. Sandoz – “Strange Brew” Boils Over Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jun
20
2015
Unified Patents v. Personalized Media Communications: Decision Denying Motion for Joinder IPR2015-00521 Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2015
B/E Aerospace v. MAG Aerospace Industries: Decision Denying Motion to Submit Supplemental Exhibits to Petition IPR-2014-01510, -01511, -01513 Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2015
New USPTO Expedited Patent Appeal Pilot Program Mintz
Jun
19
2015
Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn v. Michelle Lee: Permissible to Require Patentee to Show Substitute Claims Are Patentable Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2015
Riverbed Tech v. Silver Peak Systems: Final Written Decision Suggesting that Motivation Reference need not be Printed Publication IPR2014-00245 Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2015
Crowdfunding and IP in Health and Biotech Start-ups (Part 1): The Beginning Mintz
Jun
19
2015
Future of Means-Plus-Function Claim Interpretation Now Less Clear Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jun
19
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 19, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
18
2015
SDI Technologies v. Bose Corporation: Final Written Decision Finding All Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2014-00343 Faegre Drinker
Jun
18
2015
Williamson v. Citrix Online Highlights Potential Unintended Consequences of Functional Limitations in Patent Claims Katten
Jun
18
2015
What Was Old Is New Again for Means + Function Claim Elements re: Patent Litigation McDermott Will & Emery
Jun
18
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 18, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
18
2015
Federal Circuit Issues First Reversal & Remand of an Inter Partes Review in Microsoft Corporation v. Proxyconn, Inc. Addressing Claim Construction and Amendment Standards Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
18
2015
Job Applicant Software Patents Not Terminated for Invalidity Proskauer Rose LLP
Jun
18
2015
Cepheid v. Roche Molecular Systems and Mayo Foundation: Denying Institution for Not Providing Sufficient Evidence of Inherency IPR2015-00255 Faegre Drinker
Jun
18
2015
Intellectual Property Cases: Trends in the Sixth Circuit Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins