Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jun
1
2015
In Re Cipro: California Supreme Court's "Structured" Approach to Applying the Actavis Standard to State Antitrust Claims ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jun
1
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – June 1, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jun
1
2015
In Affirming a Preliminary Injunction Against Drug Companies, Second Circuit Finds Coercion in Product Hopping Scheme American University Washington College of Law
Jun
1
2015
Askeladden v. iSourceLoans: Denying Rehearing IPR2015-00134 Faegre Drinker
May
31
2015
Applicability of the Entire Market Value Rule in Hatch-Waxman Cases McDermott Will & Emery
May
31
2015
PTO Refusal to Terminate Ongoing Proceeding Is Not Immediately Reviewable McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2015
Cable Networks Throw Copyright Infringement Haymaker at Online Streaming Sites Proskauer Rose LLP
May
30
2015
Need to Establish Criticality of Claimed Range to Avoid Anticipation by Broader, Overlapping Range McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2015
Cannot Deny Defendant’s Attorneys’ Fees Motion After Finding Case Exceptional Without Basis McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2015
Apple v. Samsung: Design Patents Reap Profits Foley & Lardner LLP
May
30
2015
Counterfeiting – Bad Business for E-Commerce Websites Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
30
2015
Motivation to Combine Reviewable for Clear Error - Insite Vision Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
May
30
2015
Changes in Russian Trademark Law Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
29
2015
Claim Construction OK; but Still No Summary Judgment Where Material Facts Remain in Dispute McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Implementation of Teva’s Hybrid Review Claim Construction McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
No Substantial Change in Standard for Indefiniteness Under “Reasonable Certainty” Test McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Allvoice Decision Provides Roadmap For Software-based Inventions Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
May
29
2015
Info-Hold Cases: De Novo Review Where Claim Construction Evidence Is Neither Intrinsic Nor Extrinsic and Expert Damages Testimony Unnecessary for Damages McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
No Competitive Injury Without Intent and Action to Enter the Market re: False Marking Statute McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Quantify Versus Quality Determines Domestic Industry: Lelo Inc. v. International Trade Commission McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Biodelivery Sciences International v. Monosol RX: Denying Institution Because of Insufficient Explanation of Why POSITA Would Have Found the Invention Obvious IPR2015-00167 Faegre Drinker
May
29
2015
Divided Commission Upholds ALJ’s Default Sanction and Attorney Fee Award Against Respondent and its Law Firm McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
An Abstract Idea by Any Other Name - Epicor Software Corp. v. Protegrity Corp., Google Inc. v. Unwired Planet, LLC McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
ID on Infringement and Public Interest in Remand of InterDigital Investigation McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
A Sucking Sound on Domain Names: .SUCKS is Open for Registration Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
29
2015
Federal Circuit Vacates Panel Decision on Disparaging Trademark and Orders En Banc Hearing McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Technological Invention Exception Key to Foiling CBM McDermott Will & Emery
May
29
2015
Ericsson v. Intellectual Ventures I: Publication Date on an IEEE Publication Found to Meet Exception to Hearsay Rule in Final Written Decision for IPR2014-00527 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins