Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
May
12
2015
The Antitrust Agencies’ Comments on the Patent System Covington & Burling LLP
May
12
2015
Daicel Corporation v. Celanese International Corporation: Denying Institution IPR2014-01515 Faegre Drinker
May
12
2015
Wavemarket Inc. d/b/a Location Labs v. LocatioNet Systems: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00199 Faegre Drinker
May
12
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 12, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
12
2015
Daifuku Co., Ltd. and Daifuku America Corp. v. Murata Machinery, Ltd.: Denying Institution IPR2015-00084,87 Faegre Drinker
May
12
2015
California Supreme Court Scrutinizes Reverse Payment ANDA Settlements Foley & Lardner LLP
May
12
2015
Edmund Optics, Inc. v. Semrock, Inc., Granting Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2014-00599 Faegre Drinker
May
11
2015
Third Party Observations in China – Part 7 of an 8 Part Series Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
May
11
2015
Samsung Electronics v. Smartflash LLC: Denying Leave to File Motion to Compel Routine Discovery CBM2014-00190 Faegre Drinker
May
11
2015
Who Exactly Is a ‘User’ under the DMCA Safe Harbor? Proskauer Rose LLP
May
11
2015
Temporal Power, Ltd. v. Beacon Power, LLC, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-00146 Faegre Drinker
May
11
2015
The PTAB Explores Estoppel in New Representative Decision Mintz
May
11
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 11, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
11
2015
US/Cuba Relations: What You Need to Know About Protecting US Brands in Cuba Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
May
10
2015
Autel U.S. and Autel Intelligent Tech v. Bosch Automotive: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00183 Faegre Drinker
May
9
2015
No One Told John Oliver About the America Invents Act: Last Week Tonight Stuck in 2012 Mintz
May
8
2015
Purdue Pharma v. Depomed: Denying Request for Rehearing Decision on Institution IPR2014-00379 Faegre Drinker
May
8
2015
Medtronic v. Marital Deduction Trust and Endotach: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00100 Faegre Drinker
May
8
2015
Weekly Data Privacy Alert – 4 May 2015 Squire Patton Boggs (US) LLP
May
8
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 8, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
8
2015
LevelUp’s Pursuit of Attorney’s Fees Goes Up to the Federal Circuit Level Proskauer Rose LLP
May
8
2015
Google v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision IPR2014-00036 Faegre Drinker
May
8
2015
FTC and DOJ: The PTO’s Efforts to Enhance Patent Quality Will Promote Competition, Innovation and Consumer Welfare Mintz
May
7
2015
Greene’s Energy Group v. Oil States Energy Services: Final Written Decision (Motion to Amend) IPR2014-00216 Faegre Drinker
May
7
2015
Opportunity for Equivalents in Claim Amendments Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
May
7
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – May 7, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
7
2015
Federal Circuit Grants Injunction Keeping Sandoz’s Biosimilar Version of Neupogen Off Market Until Appeal Decided Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
May
7
2015
Maximizing Use of the USPTO’s Patent Application Alert Service Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins