Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Aug
17
2015
NESTLÉ USA v. STEUBEN FOODS: Differing Claim Construction For The Same Patent Claims In Two Separate IPRs IPR2015-00023 Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2015
Shopkick v. Novitaz: Denying Institution Where no Meaningful Obviousness Analysis is Provided IPR2015-00277, 00278 Faegre Drinker
Sep
21
2012
Are Biosimilars the Next Generation of Small Drug Manufacturers? Faegre Drinker
Sep
10
2015
Google Inc. v. ART+COM Innovationpool GmbH: Denying Institution When References Were Not Shown to Be “Publicly Accessible” IPR2015-00788, 789 Faegre Drinker
Oct
7
2015
Avocent Huntsville Corp and Liebert Corporation v. Cyber Switching Patents, LLC: Board Explains Differences and Limitations on Supplemental Evidence and Supplemental Information IPR2015-00690 Faegre Drinker
Oct
26
2015
Allscripts Healthcare Solutions v. MyMedicalRecords: Proceedings Not Terminated After Federal Circuit Appeal Dismissed CBM2015-00022 Faegre Drinker
Nov
1
2015
Seagate Technology (US) Holdings, Inc. and Seagate Technology LLC v. Enova Technology Corporation, Decision Granting Motion To Expunge Patent Owner’s Motion for Observation Which Commented On Patent Owner’s Own Expert Faegre Drinker
Nov
30
2015
Square v. Unwired Planet: Final Written Decision holding that Board’s Authority not limited to Grounds Alleged in Petition IPR2014-01164 Faegre Drinker
Dec
4
2015
RPX Corporation v. Applications in Internet Time: Additional Discovery into RPI Granted Where Evidence Showed Petitioner May Act as Agent or Proxy for Third Parties IPR2015-01750,01752 Faegre Drinker
Apr
18
2013
State and Commerce Publish Final Rules Defining “Specially Designed” Military End-Items and Creating a New Category XIX Faegre Drinker
Jan
8
2016
ServiceNow v. BMC Softward: Authorization Denied to File Motion to Submit Supplemental Information IPR2015-01176; -01211 Faegre Drinker
Feb
6
2019
Three Reasons NOT to do a Full Trademark Search Faegre Drinker
Aug
12
2013
Preparing for Generalized System of Preferences (GSP) Renewal Faegre Drinker
Mar
2
2016
CaptionCall v. Ultratec: Order Denying Authorization For Motion To Request Additional Discovery IPR2015-00636, 00637 Faegre Drinker
Mar
4
2016
Instradent USA v. Nobel Biocare Services AG: Institution Denied IPR2015-01784 Faegre Drinker
Mar
31
2016
Front Row Technologies, LLC v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P. - Institution of Inter Partes Review Denied IPR2015-01932 Faegre Drinker
May
10
2016
Smart Modular Tech v. Netlist: Final Written Decision with Dissent Differing with Majority’s Technical Analysis IPR2014-01374 Faegre Drinker
May
12
2016
Under Armour v. Adidas AG: Motion for Routine Discovery Granted as to Deposition Transcripts Referred to by Declarants IPR2015-00698, IPR2015-00700 Faegre Drinker
Oct
11
2019
Lack of Co-ownership for Terminally Disclaimed Patents May Doom a Lawsuit and Result in an Award of Attorneys’ Fees Faegre Drinker
May
25
2016
INTA 2016 Trends: Bigger Platform and Changing Role for Trademark Lawyers (International Trademark Association) Faegre Drinker
Jun
3
2016
Denying Request to Modify Final Written Decision After Appeal to Federal Circuit CBM2013-00035 Faegre Drinker
Jan
10
2020
BIG TRUSS: A Playoff Story of Opportunism at the Trademark Office Faegre Drinker
Jul
14
2016
Institution of Inter Partes Review Denied for Twilio Inc. v. TeleSign Corporation (IPR2016-00450) Faegre Drinker
May
28
2014
PNC Financial Services Group, Inc. and PNC Bank, N.A. v. Intellectual Ventures, Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review Faegre Drinker
May
30
2014
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc., Order Granting Motion to Stay Reexam IPR2014-00043 Faegre Drinker
Jul
29
2016
Early Post-Brexit Considerations for International Business Faegre Drinker
Jun
5
2014
Distinctive Developments, Ltd. v. Uniloc USA, Inc., Denying Motion for Leave to File a Motion to Strike Petitioner’s Reply Faegre Drinker
Aug
22
2016
Marco v. Polo: Navigating Around “Likelihood of Confusion” Refusals Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins