Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
28
2015
PTAB Rejects Attempts to Expand the Scope of CBM Review Par Pharm., Inc. v. Jazz Pharm., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2015
PTAB Designates Recent Ruling as Information: Proposed Complaints Do Not Trigger the Time-Bar Under § 315(b) TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Elecs., Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2015
Top 5 Takeaways for Trademark Owners from the Supreme Court's Hana Financial, Inc. v. Hana Bank Tacking Decision Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
27
2015
Tangible Claim Elements Failed to Save Abstract Business-Method Patent Dell Inc. v. Disposition Servs. LLC McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2015
Taking Advantage of Brazil’s Green Patent Pilot Program Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Feb
27
2015
No Exception for Energy Management Patent—CBM Review Instituted Opower Inc. v. Cleantech Business Solutions McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2015
Dr. Michael Farmwald and RPX Corp. v. ParkerVision, Inc.: No Markman Prior to Oral Argument in IPR McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2015
Target Corp. v. Destination Maternity Corp.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00530 Faegre Drinker
Feb
27
2015
Medtronic, Inc. v. Norred: PTAB Is Unimpressed by Over-Lawyering McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2015
Librestream Technologies, Inc. v. Thomason: You Can’t Win if You Don’t Play McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2015
PTAB Excludes Documents Corroborating Publication Date as Hearsay but Admits Librarian Testimony McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 27, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
27
2015
Valeo North America, Inc. v. Magna Electronics Inc.:Untimely Presentation of Updated Mandatory Notice Is Not a Cause for Termination McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
27
2015
Petroleum Geo-Services Inc. v. WesternGeco LLC: Reduced Deposition Time in Related AIA Proceedings McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
26
2015
First Sale and Copyright Misuse Doctrines Available to Extinguish Rights to Products Purchased in Gray Market McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
26
2015
Johnson Health Tech Co. Ltd. v. Icon Health & Fitness, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00463 Faegre Drinker
Feb
26
2015
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Willfulness Standard in Copyright Infringement Actions McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
26
2015
Allocation of Copyright Damages for Co-Owners McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
26
2015
Waste Management of Washington, Inc. v. Kattler et al: Contempt Charge Vacated Based On Valid Assertion of Attorney Client Privilege McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
26
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 26, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
26
2015
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Co. v. Gum Tree Prop. Management, LLC: Duty to Defend Only Triggered Where Subject Activities Are Specified in the Policy McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2015
Unauthorized Use of Patented Grape Plants Not an Invalidating Public Use Delano Farms Co. v. California Table Grape Comm’n McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2015
Johnson Health Tech Co. Ltd. and Johnson Health Tech North America, Inc. v. Icon Health Fitness, Inc.: Denying Institution IPR2014-01242 Faegre Drinker
Feb
25
2015
Legal Malpractice Claims Against Prosecuting Attorneys Belong in State Court: NeuroRepair, Inc. v. Nath Law Group McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2015
USPTO Releases Examples for Interim Examination Guidelines for Determining Patent Eligibility Under 35 U.S.C. § 101 McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2015
The Court’s Decision in the FLANAX US Trademark Dispute Gives Bayer a Headache Mintz
Feb
25
2015
The Apparently Never-Ending Story of Bard v. W.L. Gore Bard Peripheral Vascular Inc. and C.R. Bard, Inc. v. W.L. Gore & Associates, Inc. McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2015
Wireless Does Not Mean “Without Wires”; “Streaming Video” Does Not Mean Emailing a Video File- In re Kevin R. Imes McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins