Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
25
2015
Federal Circuit Affirms PTAB’s Lack of Patentability Ruling in First-Ever AIA Review: In re Cuozzo Speed Techs., LLC McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
25
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 25, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
25
2015
Gnosis S.P.A., Gnosis Bioresearch S.A., and Gnosis U.S.A., Inc. v. Merck & Cie: Order Lifting Stay of Concurrent Reexamination Faegre Drinker
Feb
25
2015
Conopco, Inc. dba Unilever v. The Proctor & Gamble Company: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00505 Faegre Drinker
Feb
25
2015
Petitioners v. Simon Nicholas Richmond: Order Granting Motion to Expedite IPR2015-00580 Faegre Drinker
Feb
24
2015
Virginia Court Dismisses Webcaster’s Suit Concerning Geofencing Workaround to Copyright Royalty Obligations Proskauer Rose LLP
Feb
24
2015
Don’t Jeopardize Your Patent Rights: Best Patent Practices for Startups Varnum LLP
Feb
24
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 24, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
24
2015
Unified Patents Inc. v. Dragon Intellectual Property, LLC: Decision on Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01252 Faegre Drinker
Feb
24
2015
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.: Terminating Proceedings IPR2014-00041, 43, 51, 55, 55 Faegre Drinker
Feb
23
2015
EU 'Patent Wars'– Injunctive Relief Looking Less Likely Option for Standard Essential Patent Holders Greenberg Traurig, LLP
Feb
23
2015
TD Ameritrade v. Trading Technologies International, Inc.,: Denying Rehearing Faegre Drinker
Feb
23
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 23, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
23
2015
Prepare for the Japanese Patent Opposition System Coming Soon Mintz
Feb
20
2015
Kedem, LLC v. Team International Group of America, Inc. Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
20
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 20, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
20
2015
Pacing Technologies v. Garmin – D&D Explained Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
20
2015
Search America, Inc. v. Transunion Intelligence, LLC: Final Written Decision CBM2013-00037 Faegre Drinker
Feb
19
2015
Life Sciences: Protecting the Crown Jewels Sills Cummis & Gross P.C.
Feb
19
2015
Bargaining with Apple: Understanding the iOS Developer Program License Agreement Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Feb
19
2015
Global TelLink Corp. v. Securus Tech., Inc.: Denying Institution CBM2014-00166 Faegre Drinker
Feb
19
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 19, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
19
2015
Samsung Electronics: Denying Joinder and Institution IPR2015-00118 re: Patent Litigation Faegre Drinker
Feb
18
2015
Valeo and Connaught Electronics Ltd. v. Magna Electronics, Inc.: Clarifying Distinction Between Supplemental Information and Evidence Faegre Drinker
Feb
18
2015
“Precision Medicine” Initiative Leaves Patents “Lost in Space” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Feb
18
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – February 18, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
18
2015
TD Ameritrade Holding Corp., et al. v. Trading Technologies Int’l, Inc: Order Regarding Translator Declarations Faegre Drinker
Feb
17
2015
A Circuit Split or Just a Surface-Blemish: Why Kienitz v. Sconnie Nation LLC Doesn’t Conflict with Cariou v. Prince Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins