Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Feb
1
2015
Fidelity National v. CheckFree: Limitations Drawn from Specification Not Enough to Overcome McDermott Will & Emery
Feb
1
2015
Generic Top Level Domains - Current Sunrise Periods Open January 2015 Update Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Feb
1
2015
Pom Wonderful Likely to Succeed in Infringement Claim Against “pŏm”-Branded Beverage: Pom Wonderful LLC v. Hubbard McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
31
2015
TAKETEN and TAKE10! Can Coexist Without Confusion re: Trademarks McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
31
2015
Unified Patents, Inc. v. Broadband iTV, Inc.: Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-01222 Faegre Drinker
Jan
31
2015
Memorylink Corp. v. Motorola Solutions, Inc: Assignment Consideration Can Be Representation, Support and Opportunity McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2015
Fleming v. Escort, Inc: Even Geniuses Commit Error—Sufficient to Support Reissue McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2015
Federal Circuit Upholds PTO Refusal to Withdraw Unauthorized Terminal Disclaimer McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2015
Practice Considerations Post Teva v. Sandoz Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
30
2015
Intellectual Property: Firm Disqualified Because Preliminary Injunction Is “Directly Adverse” to Another Client McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2015
No Declaratory Jurisdiction Without Biosimilarity Application on File with FDA McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2015
Inherency Requires Factual Evidence that a Limitation Is Necessarily Present or Is the Natural Result McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2015
Respironics, Inc. v. Zoll Medical Corporation: Denying Request for Rehearing of Final Written Decision IPR2013-00322 Faegre Drinker
Jan
30
2015
Statute Intended to Close Deepsouth Loophole Given Broad Interpretation: Promega Corp. v. Life Techs. Corp. McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2015
Damage Award Slashed as Court Finds Defenses Were Not Objectively Assessed McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
30
2015
Cardiocom, LLC v. Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00431 Faegre Drinker
Jan
30
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 30, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
30
2015
Contract Corner: Considering Usage Rights in Software License Agreements Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jan
30
2015
Statements Regarding Live Scientific Debate Still Subject to False Advertising Claim McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2015
Thirty-Year-Old Conspiracy to Misappropriate Trade Secrets Lives On McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2015
Supreme Court Reaffirms the Power of the Jury to Decide Issues of Commercial Impression in a Trademark Tacking Decision Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Jan
29
2015
One Definition Fits All: The Third Circuit Applies Patent Act’s Parameters for Attorneys’ Fee Shifting in Trademark Case Katten
Jan
29
2015
Ninth Circuit Holds First Sale Doctrine Defeats Copyright Infringement Claim Over Omega Watches Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Jan
29
2015
You Say “Tom‘ah’to,” I Say “Tom‘ay’to”: Determining the Correct Pronunciation of Uniquely Coined Trademarks Katten
Jan
29
2015
Is the Comic Book Character Copyright Infringement Saga Finally Over? McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
29
2015
Supreme Court Holds Claim Construction Facts Are Subject to Clear Error Review Honigman Miller Schwartz and Cohn LLP
Jan
29
2015
“Google It”: The Search Engine’s Trademark May Be a Verb, But It’s Not Generic Katten
Jan
29
2015
District Courts Must Follow Georgia-Pacific & Seagate’s Instructions: Aqua Shield v. Inter Pool Cover Team, et al. McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins