Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Mar
18
2015
Garmin Int’l, Inc. v. MSPBO, LLC: Decision on Institution IPR2014-01379 Faegre Drinker
Mar
20
2015
Kamada, Ltd. v. Grifols Therapeutics Inc: Denying Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00899 Faegre Drinker
Mar
24
2015
Volkswagen Group of America v. Emerachem Holdings, LL: Granting Motions to Submit Corrected Translations IPR2014-01555, 01556, 01558 Faegre Drinker
Apr
1
2015
Paramount, Twentieth Century Fox, and Universal Studios v. Nissim Corp: Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00961, 00962 Faegre Drinker
Apr
3
2015
Petroleum Geo-Services v. WesternGeco: Granting Institution of Review IPR2014-01475 Faegre Drinker
Apr
7
2015
Motorola Mobility v. Intellectual Ventures: Granting Institution CBM2015-00004 Faegre Drinker
Apr
24
2015
Kaspersky v. Uniloc: Denying Institution IPR2015-00178 Faegre Drinker
Jun
11
2015
REG Synthetic Fuels LLC v. Neste Oil Oyj, Final Written Decision Granting Motion to Amend IPR2014-00192 Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2015
Riverbed Tech v. Silver Peak Systems: Final Written Decision Suggesting that Motivation Reference need not be Printed Publication IPR2014-00245 Faegre Drinker
Jun
29
2015
Bank of the West v. Secure Axcess: Patent Owner’s infringement suits is a factor in determining whether a patent is a covered business method, CBM2015-00009 Faegre Drinker
Feb
21
2012
CMS’s Proposed “Sunshine” Regulations: Implications for Research Faegre Drinker
Jul
21
2015
Square v. REM Holdings 3: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable as Obvious Over Evidence of Copying Faegre Drinker
Jul
31
2015
Medtronic v. Robert Bosch Healthcare: Granting Motions to Seal Tailored to Confidential Information Faegre Drinker
Aug
18
2015
Marvell Semiconductor v. Intellectual Ventures I: Expunging Declaration Held to be Improperly Submitted as Exhibit to Motion to Exclude IPR2014-00552 Faegre Drinker
Aug
24
2015
Google v. ContentGuard Holdings: Denial of Institution Where Corresponding MPF Structure Not Identified CBM2015-00040 Faegre Drinker
Sep
2
2015
MaxLinear, Inc. v. Cresta Technology Corporation: Denying Institution Where the Petition is Substantially the Same as a Previous Petition IPR2015-00591 Faegre Drinker
Sep
8
2015
Volkswagen Group of America, Inc., v. Signal IP, Inc.: Institution Denied Where Articulated Reasoning Was Not Provided For Obviousness Ground IPR2015-00968 Faegre Drinker
Sep
17
2015
Servicenow Inc. v. Bmc Software, Inc.: Institution Denied Because No Claim Directed To Financial Product or Service CBM2015-00107 Faegre Drinker
Sep
30
2015
eBay Inc. v. MoneyCat Ltd: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Unpatentable CBM2014-00091 Faegre Drinker
Oct
1
2015
Coalition for Affordable Drugs VI v. Celgene Corporation: Denying Motion for Sanctions IPR2015-01092 Faegre Drinker
Oct
8
2015
Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. v. Affinity Labs of Texas, Final Written Decision That All Instituted Claims Invalid IPR2014-00407 Faegre Drinker
Oct
19
2015
Nora Lighting v. Juno Manufacturing: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-00601 Faegre Drinker
Oct
30
2015
AVX Corp. v. Greatbatch: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Obvious Where Prior Art Combination Results in Performance Loss IPR2014-00697 Faegre Drinker
Nov
30
2015
PNC and SunTrust Bank v. Parus Holdings: Denying Institution Because Patent Ineligible for CBM Review CBM2015-00109; CBM2015-00149 Faegre Drinker
Dec
8
2015
ETS-Lindgren v. Microwave Vision: Denying Institution for Lack of Identification of Corresponding Structure Faegre Drinker
Dec
28
2015
Lowe's Home Centers v. Maureen Reddy: Authorization To File Motion For Late Submission of Supplemental Information After Oral Argument IPR2015-00306 Faegre Drinker
Dec
31
2015
Inguran, LLC d/b/a Sexing Technologies v. Premium Genetics (UK) Ltd: Institution of Post-Grant Review of a Patent Issuing from a Transition Application Faegre Drinker
Jan
5
2016
Seagate Technology v. Enova Tech Corp: Nexus Between Secondary Consideration And Claims Was Not Sufficient IPR2014-01449 Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins