Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Mar
31
2016
Front Row Technologies, LLC v. MLB Advanced Media, L.P. - Institution of Inter Partes Review Denied IPR2015-01932 Faegre Drinker
May
10
2016
Smart Modular Tech v. Netlist: Final Written Decision with Dissent Differing with Majority’s Technical Analysis IPR2014-01374 Faegre Drinker
May
12
2016
Under Armour v. Adidas AG: Motion for Routine Discovery Granted as to Deposition Transcripts Referred to by Declarants IPR2015-00698, IPR2015-00700 Faegre Drinker
Nov
27
2019
It’s Perfect! Or, Perfecting Security Interests in Intellectual Property Faegre Drinker
May
25
2016
INTA 2016 Trends: Bigger Platform and Changing Role for Trademark Lawyers (International Trademark Association) Faegre Drinker
Jun
3
2016
Denying Request to Modify Final Written Decision After Appeal to Federal Circuit CBM2013-00035 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2014
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc Granting Leave to File Reply to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Faegre Drinker
May
22
2014
Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Convatec Techs., Inc Denying in Part and Granting in Part Motion to Seal IPR2013-00097 Faegre Drinker
Jun
3
2014
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. v. Zond LLC, Granting Motion for Leave to File Motion for Joinder Faegre Drinker
Jun
11
2014
Motorola Mobility LLC, Google Inc., and Apple Inc. v. Arendi S.A.R.L.: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Aug
31
2016
Brexit and Your Trade Marks – Some Practical Questions Answered Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2014
Handi Quilter, Inc. and Tacony Corp. v. Bernina International AG, Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00270 Faegre Drinker
Jun
27
2014
Medtronic, Inc. v. Robert Bosch Healthcare Systems, Inc., Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00436 Faegre Drinker
Jul
8
2014
Apotex Inc. v. Wyeth LLC, Granting Motion for Leave to File Supplemental Evidence IPR2014-00115 Faegre Drinker
Jul
10
2014
Redline Detection, LLC v. Star Envirotech, Inc., Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Nov
2
2016
Seven Strategies for Speedy Service Mark (and Trademark) Registration Faegre Drinker
Jul
23
2014
Apotex Inc. v. Wyeth LLC, Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00115 Faegre Drinker
Jul
28
2014
Schott Gemtron Corporation v. SSW Holding Company, Inc., Granting Motion for Leave to File Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-00367 Faegre Drinker
Aug
4
2014
Intelligent Bio-Systems, Inc. v. Illumina Cambridge Ltd.: Denying Motion for Additional Pages for Petitioner Reply Faegre Drinker
Aug
7
2014
Experian Marketing Solutions, Inc., Epsilon Data Management, LLC, and Constant Contact, Inc. v. RPost Communications Limited: Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review Faegre Drinker
Aug
14
2014
SAS Institute, Inc. v. ComplementSoft, LLC: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00226 Faegre Drinker
Aug
16
2014
TRW Automotive US LLC v. Magna Electronics, Inc., Granting in part and Denying in part Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00266 Faegre Drinker
Aug
29
2014
Standard Innovation Corporation v. Lelo, Inc., Granting Motion for Leave to File Motion for Extension of Time: IPR2014-00148 Faegre Drinker
Sep
10
2014
Ariosa Diagnostics v. Isis Innovation Limited: Final Written Decision (Motion to Amend) IPR2012-00022 Faegre Drinker
Sep
14
2014
ARM Inc. v. Vantage Point Technology, Inc., Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00467 Faegre Drinker
Sep
17
2014
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Norman IP Holdings, LLC: Order Denying Authorization for Motion to Stay IPR2014-00563 Faegre Drinker
Sep
22
2014
Smart Modular Technologies Inc. v. Netlist, Inc.: Granting Motion for Leave to File Motion to Correct Clerical Error IPR2014-01373 Faegre Drinker
Sep
30
2014
International Business Machines (IBM) Corp. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC, IPR2014-00672: Decision Denying Institution Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins