Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Jan
26
2015
LG Display, Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-01095 Faegre Drinker
Jan
23
2015
Energy Management Patent Triggers a Covered Business Method Review Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
23
2015
Supreme Court: "Tacking" is For the Jury to Decide ArentFox Schiff LLP
Jan
23
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 23, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
23
2015
Supreme Court Holds That Factual Findings for Patent Claim Interpretation are Reviewed for Clear Error Neal, Gerber & Eisenberg LLP
Jan
22
2015
Supreme Court Alters Appellate Standard of Review for Claim Construction in Patent Cases Hunton Andrews Kurth
Jan
22
2015
Patent Claim Construction Now Subject to Hybrid Review: Teva Pharmaceutical v. Sandoz McDermott Will & Emery
Jan
22
2015
Supreme Court’s Trademark Tacking Decision: Possible Impact on Likelihood of Confusion? Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jan
22
2015
Can Digital Healthcare Innovation Be Patented? Eligibility of Digital Healthcare Technologies Under the New USPTO Eligibility Guidelines Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
22
2015
Alcohol Monitoring Systems, Inc. v. Soberlink, Inc: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00577 Faegre Drinker
Jan
22
2015
The Copaxone Story in the U.S. and India: U.S. Supreme Court Decision Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
22
2015
Wireless Seismic, Inc. v. Fairfield Industries, Inc. Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-01205 Faegre Drinker
Jan
22
2015
Anderson v. Kimberly-Clark Corporation: Design Patent Case Digest Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
21
2015
Supreme Court Affirms Ninth Circuit Decision: Trademark Tacking is a Question for the Jury Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
21
2015
US Supreme Court Holds that Juries Should Decide the Issue of Trademark Tacking Mintz
Jan
21
2015
Supreme Court Alters Claim Construction Review Standard in Patent Litigation Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
Jan
21
2015
Teva v. Sandoz pt.II– The Dissent And The Zone Of Uncertainty Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
21
2015
Supreme Court Alters the Standard of Review For Patent Claim Construction Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Jan
21
2015
Teva Pharmaceuticals v. Sandoz: Supreme Court Changes Standard of Review in Claim Construction Case Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Jan
21
2015
Claim Construction in Patents: Teva v. Sandoz: “Just the facts, Ma’am” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
21
2015
Copyright and Marriage Equality Act: Bills Introduced in both the House and Senate Mintz
Jan
21
2015
Riverbed Technology, Inc. v. Silver Peak Systems, Inc., Order Regarding Certificate of Correction IPR2014-00245 Faegre Drinker
Jan
21
2015
Petition Denied For Failing To Name Real Party-In-Interest: Inter Partes Review Armstrong Teasdale
Jan
20
2015
Giant Multinational Unilever Drops Suit Against Innovative Start-up Hampton Creek Over Eggless “Mayonnaise” Covington & Burling LLP
Jan
20
2015
Myriad’s Fight Continues: Federal Circuit Finds Composition and Method Claims Ineligible Covington & Burling LLP
Jan
20
2015
Promega v. Life Technologies – “Too Much Of Nothing?” re: Patent Infringement Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Jan
20
2015
PTO Litigation Center Report – January 20, 2015 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Jan
19
2015
The Explicit Definition of a Claim Term Is Not Limiting Where It Excludes a Preferred Embodiment McDermott Will & Emery
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins