Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization Sort descending
Sep
26
2015
PURDUE PHARMA L.P. v. DEPOMED, INC.Final Written Decision Finding No Claims Unpatentable Because Lack of Reason for Combining Known Features IPR2014-00377 Faegre Drinker
Oct
9
2015
Kingbright Electronics v. Cree: Decision on Institution Denied IPR2015-00748 Faegre Drinker
Oct
14
2015
ServiceNow, Inc. v. Hewlett-Packard, Co., Patent Claims Not Eligible for CBM Review CBM2015-00108 Faegre Drinker
Oct
26
2015
Ford Motor Company v. Signal IP: Granting Motion to Stay Reexamination where Board is Considering a Motion to Consolidate IPR2015-00860 Faegre Drinker
Nov
15
2015
International Business Machines v. Intellectual Ventures II - Final Written Decision Finding Claim Patentable Where Patent Owner Disqualifies References As Prior Art IPR2014-00587 Faegre Drinker
Dec
4
2015
Seoul Semiconductor Co., Ltd and North America Seoul Semiconductor, Inc. v. Enplas Corporation: Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Dec
22
2015
SK Innovation Co. v. Celgard: Final Written Decision Finding Claims Unpatentable Where Nexus For Secondary Considerations Is Not Established IPR2014-00680 Faegre Drinker
Dec
25
2015
Factual Inc. v. Locata LBS LLC: Granting Motion to Strike Objections for Being Untimely Faegre Drinker
Jan
4
2016
Universal Remote Control v. Universal Electronics: Final Written Decision Concluding Nexus Not Established IPR2014-01102 Faegre Drinker
Jan
8
2016
Bungie v. Worlds: Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2015-01325 Faegre Drinker
Jan
12
2016
Terremark N. Am. v. Joao Control & Monitoring Systems: Miscues in Service of Petition Found Harmless in Granted Institution IPR2015-01466 Faegre Drinker
Jan
22
2016
International Business Machines Corporation v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC - Demonstratives Precluded At Hearing IPR2015-00089; -00092 Faegre Drinker
Feb
9
2016
Oracle Corp. v. Crossroads Systems: Final Written Decision finding Four-Month Period of Inactivity Sufficient to Defeat Patent Owner’s Claim of Diligence IPR2014-01209 Faegre Drinker
Mar
2
2016
Seagate Technology v. Enova Tech Corp: Final Written Decision Finding Challenged Claims Unpatentable Where Patent Owner’s Proposed Claim Construction Was Too Narrow IPR2014-01297 Faegre Drinker
Jun
17
2019
Return Mail v. Postal Service: The Supreme Court Rules the Federal Government May Not Petition for Institution of Post-Issuance Patent Reviews Faegre Drinker
Mar
7
2016
E-Loan v. IMX: Final Written Decision finding Challenged Claims Unpatentable under 35 U.S.C. 101 CBM2015-00012 Faegre Drinker
Apr
14
2016
Genband Management Services v. Metaswitch Networks: IPR2015-01457 Request for Rehearing Granted Faegre Drinker
Apr
18
2016
Securus Tech., Inc. v. Global Tel*Link Corp.: Final Written Decision Finding Insufficient Articulated Reasoning Presented in Support of Obviousness Grounds IPR2015-00155 Faegre Drinker
Apr
21
2016
Old Republic General Insurance Group, Inc., et al. v. Intellectual Ventures II LLC: Institution of CBM Review Denied CBM2015-00184 Faegre Drinker
May
12
2016
RPX Corp v. Applications in Internet Time: Motion For Sanctions Granted-in-part for Violation of Unentered Protective Order IPR2015-01750 Faegre Drinker
May
23
2016
Snap-On v. Milwaukee Electric Tool Corp: Order Authorizing Application for Subpoena to Obtain Discovery from Non-Party IPR2015-01242, -01243, -01244 Faegre Drinker
Jun
19
2016
WesternGeco, L.L.C. v. PGS Geophysical AS, Final Written Decision Finding Certain of the Challenged Claims Unpatentable IPR2015-00309 Faegre Drinker
May
20
2014
Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLC v. Endo Pharmaceuticals Inc Granting Leave to File Reply to Patent Owner Preliminary Response Faegre Drinker
Apr
6
2020
The Functionality Doctrine Remains Strong Faegre Drinker
May
22
2014
Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. Convatec Techs., Inc Denying in Part and Granting in Part Motion to Seal IPR2013-00097 Faegre Drinker
Jun
3
2014
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company, Ltd. v. Zond LLC, Granting Motion for Leave to File Motion for Joinder Faegre Drinker
Jun
11
2014
Motorola Mobility LLC, Google Inc., and Apple Inc. v. Arendi S.A.R.L.: Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review Faegre Drinker
Aug
31
2016
Brexit and Your Trade Marks – Some Practical Questions Answered Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins