Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Dec
19
2014
Design Patent Case Digest: Young v. Stone Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
19
2014
Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC, Granting Leave to File Motion to Strike Deposition Testimony CBM2014-00102, 106, 108, 112 Faegre Drinker
Dec
19
2014
Apple Inc. v. Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute and Dynamic Advances, LLC, Denying Second Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00319 Faegre Drinker
Dec
18
2014
2014 Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Under Myriad and Nature-Based Products Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
18
2014
2014 Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Provide Limited Direction for Software Implemented Inventions Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
18
2014
Revised Guidelines for Patentable Subject Matter Eligibility Vedder Price
Dec
18
2014
Mayo Meet Alice Meet Myriad – Fed. Cir. Appreciates “Abstract Art” Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
18
2014
Challenging “Obvious to Try” during Patent Prosecution Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Dec
18
2014
Woodward/White, Inc. v. Thomas Reuters (Legal) Inc., Denying Institution IPR2014-00854 Faegre Drinker
Dec
18
2014
Phigenix, Inc. v. Genentech, Inc. and Immunogen, Inc.: IPR2014-00842, Denying Institution IPR2014-00842 Faegre Drinker
Dec
17
2014
The USPTO’s New Guidance Simplifies Prosecution by Clarifying Subject-Matter Eligibility of Patents Armstrong Teasdale
Dec
17
2014
Turning Your Research Into Something More: Patents Versus Papers Mintz
Dec
17
2014
Post Holiday Trademark Sale!!!!!!! Giordano, Halleran & Ciesla, P.C.
Dec
17
2014
Conopco, Inc. dba Unilever v. The Procter & Gamble Co.: IPR2014-00506, Denying Rehearing of Institution Denial IPR2014-00506 Faegre Drinker
Dec
17
2014
A New Domain Name Dispute Alternative: The Uniform Rapid Suspension System (URS) Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Dec
17
2014
Wolf Greenfield’s Awesome Intellectual Property Law Firm Holiday Card Fishman Marketing, Inc.
Dec
17
2014
LG Display Co., Ltd. v. Innovative Display Technologies LLC: Denying Leave to File a Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2014-01357, 1362 Faegre Drinker
Dec
16
2014
USPTO Has a Shadow Program for Subjecting Patent Applications to Heightened Scrutiny, and It Should Concern You (But Not Too Much) Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
16
2014
USPTO Issues New Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Interim Guidelines – Nature-Based Product Guidance Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
16
2014
Sandoz and Celltrion Decline the Invitation to Dance: Biosimilars Challenge the Applicability of the BPCIA’s Exchange Provisions Before Bringing Suit Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Dec
16
2014
Revised 2014 Interim Guidance on Patent Subject Matter Eligibility Released by PTO Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Dec
16
2014
Design Patent Case Digest: Reddy v. Lowe’s Companies, Inc. Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
16
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – December 16, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
16
2014
USPTO Issues New Subject Matter Eligibility Examination Interim Guidelines – Abstract Idea Guidance Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Dec
15
2014
Toyota Motor Corporation v. American Vehicular Sciences LLC: Denying Motion for Joinder IPR 2013-00419 Faegre Drinker
Dec
15
2014
USPTO Announces New Guidance on Post-Alice Subject Matter Eligibility Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Dec
15
2014
Architect’s Markings on Drawings Did Not Trump Terms of Construction Contract Barnes & Thornburg LLP
Dec
15
2014
For the First Time PTAB Upholds Validity of Pharma Patents Mintz
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins