Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Oct
17
2014
Target Corp. Requests Rehearing of Denied Inter Partes Review by Expanded Patent Trial and Appeal Board Panel Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
17
2014
Mobotix Corp. v. e-Watch, Inc. Final Written Decision IPR2013-00334 Faegre Drinker
Oct
16
2014
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Apatech, Inc., and Apatech Limited v. Millenium Biologix, LLC, Order Excluding Evidence IPR2013-00582, 590 Faegre Drinker
Oct
16
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 16, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
16
2014
Six Key Topics to Track During Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 51 in Los Angeles Katten
Oct
15
2014
Use As a Verb Not Always the Kiss of Death for Trademarks: Elliot v. Google Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Oct
15
2014
GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. Lakshmi Arunachalam Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review CBM2014-00101 Faegre Drinker
Oct
15
2014
Microsoft Corp. v. Secure Web Conference Corp Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00745 Faegre Drinker
Oct
15
2014
Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC - Further Analysis Decision Denying Institution Covered Business Method Patent Review CBM2014-00110 Faegre Drinker
Oct
15
2014
FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Leak Surveys, Inc., Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Supplemental Information Faegre Drinker
Oct
14
2014
.bit: Why Brands Need to Pay Attention [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
14
2014
Level 3 Communications, LLC v. AIP Acquisition LLC, Final Written Decision IPR2013-00296 Faegre Drinker
Oct
14
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 14, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
14
2014
First Mailbox Appeal to be decided by the Federal Court of Appeals in Brazil Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Oct
14
2014
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic Vascular, Inc., and Medtronic Corevalve, LLC v. Troy R. Norred, M.D.: Order Regarding Objections During Depositions Faegre Drinker
Oct
13
2014
Inter Partes Review (IPR) Decisions as Evidence in Litigation? Armstrong Teasdale
Oct
13
2014
Aker Biomarine AS and Enzymotec Ltd. and Enzymotec USA, Inc. v. Neptune Technologies and Bioressources Inc.: Denying Motion to Compel Additional Discovery IPR2014-00003 Faegre Drinker
Oct
10
2014
Landmark Oracle-Google Android Copyright Dispute May End Up In Supreme Court Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
10
2014
Design Patent Case Digest: Medtronic, Inc. v. NuVasive, Inc. Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
10
2014
Allegations that Defendants Provided Product for “Free” State Claims Under California’s Unfair Practices Act (UPA) and Unfair Competition Law (UCL), Notwithstanding that “Cost” of Product Was Recouped by Overcharging for Shipping Sheppard, Mullin, Richter & Hampton LLP
Oct
10
2014
Order Pierces Allegations Unsupported By Receivable Evidence In Granting Summary Judgment To All Parties In IP Dispute Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Oct
10
2014
Don't Lose Your Trademark Through Careless Licensing Proskauer Rose LLP
Oct
10
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 10, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
10
2014
ICANN’s gTLD Program – A Look Back and Forward Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
10
2014
Card Verification v. Citigroup: Software Patent Survives 12(b)(6) Abstract Idea Attack Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
9
2014
Generic Top Level Domains - Current Sunrise Periods Open - October 2014 Update Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
9
2014
Fujitsu Semiconductor Limited and Fujitsu Semiconductor America, Inc. v. Zond, LLC: Granting Motion for Joinder IPR2014-00845 Faegre Drinker
Oct
9
2014
European Patent Office (EPO) – New Guidance On Added Subject Matter Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins