Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Oct
21
2014
Patent Board Denies First Data Corp. IPR Petitions Based on Real Party In Interest and One-Year Bar Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
21
2014
Inter Partes Review Initial Filings of Paramount Importance: What Is Clear After Two Years of Inter Partes Review Under the America Invents Act (AIA) Mintz
Oct
21
2014
Biotechnology Industry Organization (BIO) Provides Supplemental Comments on PTO s.101 Guidelines Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
21
2014
2014 IP Record Shows Continued Growth for Design Patent Filings [VIDEO] Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
21
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 21, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
21
2014
Mobotix Corp. v. e-Watch, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00337 Faegre Drinker
Oct
21
2014
A.C. Dispensing Equipment Inc. v. Prince Castle LLC: Denying Motion to Conduct Re-Examination of Witness IPR2014-00511 Faegre Drinker
Oct
20
2014
Mobotix Corp. v. E-Watch, Inc.: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00335 Faegre Drinker
Oct
20
2014
Sipnet EU S.R.O. v. Straight Path IP Group, Inc., Final Written Decision IPR2013-00246 Faegre Drinker
Oct
20
2014
IPR (Inter Partes Review) Challenge to Pharmaceutical Compound Patent Denied Armstrong Teasdale
Oct
20
2014
Iron Dome LLC v. Chinook Licensing DE LLC: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00674 Faegre Drinker
Oct
20
2014
Librestream Technoloiges, Inc. v. Wireless Remote System LLC.: Order Vacating Due Dates IPR2014-00369 Faegre Drinker
Oct
20
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 20, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
20
2014
Electronically Signing USPTO Papers: There’s a Rule for That Mintz
Oct
20
2014
Microsoft Corp. v. Enfish, LLC, Denying Motion to Quash Deposition Notice Faegre Drinker
Oct
18
2014
Medtronic, Medtronic Vascular, and Medtronic Corevalve v. Troy R. Norred, M.D., Order Regarding Scope of Re-Direct Deposition IPR2014-00110, IPR2014-00111 Faegre Drinker
Oct
17
2014
Fidelity National Information Services, Inc. v. DataTreasury Corp., Denying Petitioner’s Request for Rehearing of Decision on Institution IPR2014-00489; IPR2014-00490; IPR2014-00491 Faegre Drinker
Oct
17
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 17, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
17
2014
Target Corp. Requests Rehearing of Denied Inter Partes Review by Expanded Patent Trial and Appeal Board Panel Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Oct
17
2014
Mobotix Corp. v. e-Watch, Inc. Final Written Decision IPR2013-00334 Faegre Drinker
Oct
16
2014
Baxter Healthcare Corp., Apatech, Inc., and Apatech Limited v. Millenium Biologix, LLC, Order Excluding Evidence IPR2013-00582, 590 Faegre Drinker
Oct
16
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – October 16, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Oct
16
2014
Six Key Topics to Track During Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) 51 in Los Angeles Katten
Oct
15
2014
Use As a Verb Not Always the Kiss of Death for Trademarks: Elliot v. Google Lewis Roca Rothgerber LLP
Oct
15
2014
GSI Commerce Solutions, Inc. v. Lakshmi Arunachalam Decision Denying Institution of Covered Business Method Patent Review CBM2014-00101 Faegre Drinker
Oct
15
2014
Microsoft Corp. v. Secure Web Conference Corp Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00745 Faegre Drinker
Oct
15
2014
Apple Inc. v. Smartflash LLC - Further Analysis Decision Denying Institution Covered Business Method Patent Review CBM2014-00110 Faegre Drinker
Oct
15
2014
FLIR Systems, Inc. v. Leak Surveys, Inc., Denying Motion for Leave to File Motion for Supplemental Information Faegre Drinker
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins