Intellectual Property Law

HB Ad Slot
HB Mobile Ad Slot

Intellectual property applies to many different areas of the legal world. Applying for patents for work-products, by individual employees, trademark laws, copyrights, and how companies leverage their IP asset-rights over employees, are just a few of the many areas the National Law Review covers as it pertains to IP.

Intellectual Property Litigation

Intellectual Property disputes are a complex area of law, often involving deep dives into complex concepts to understand the issues at play. In the United States, the United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO/PTO) is the agency involved in registering patents and trademarks.   As part of the USPTO, the Patent Trial and Appeal Board settles patent disputes, using a variety of mechanisms to settle issues related to intellectual property.    Some of the mechanisms include inter partes review, post-grant procedures, and covered business method patent reviews.  Issues related to the America Invents Act are also settled through the PTAB. The National Law Review covers changes to standards held by the USPTO in litigation and other patent issues.  The Trademark Trial and Appeal Board settles disputes related to trademarks, such as an ex parte appeal from the denial of an application for registration by an examining attorney, and an inter partes opposition, cancellation, concurrent use, or interference proceeding.  Other agencies involved in patent disputes are the International Trade Commission (ITC) or the Federal Trade Commission (FTC).  The National Law Review covers patent news as it relates to Supreme Court (SCOTUS) and federal circuit courts’ appeals, as well as general patent litigation and new patent filings.

Intellectual Property in Drug Patents

Legal analysis related to drug patents and pharmaceuticals and the interplay with intellectual property issues are also covered by the National Law Review.   Drug patents, biosimilars, generic top-level domain registration (gTLD), trade secrets, non-compete clauses, and other patent application news are updated on the site regularly. Additionally, tangential issues that impact pharmaceutical companies, such as innovator liability and related litigation, are also analyzed by the legal experts who write for the National Law Review. 

Intellectual Property in an Employment Context

The National Law Review has legal analysis on the intersection between intellectual property rights and employment, and who owns ideas, the Work Made For Hire principle as well resulting litigation. Additionally, legislation such as the Defense of Trade Secrets Act and its impact on workplaces, and ongoing litigation related to the legislation is also covered.

International Intellectual Property

Visitors to the site will oftentimes read about international news as it relates to patent applications in the US, and internationally as well. Pharmaceutical patents in Brazil, medical device patent applications from the United Kingdom, or litigation from the European Union, China, India, and other international sectors, are often covered online. Visitors will find the latest coverage, news, and insights on patent applications and litigation, when visiting the National Law Review, for up-to-date practice-area news.

National Law Review Intellectual Property/Patent Law TwitterFor hourly updates on the latest news about Intellectual Property Law, IP Litigation, Patent Legislation, and more, be sure to follow our IP Law Twitter feed, and sign up for complimentary e-news bulletins.

Recent Intellectual Property, Patent, Trademark & Copyright News

Title
Custom text Organization
Sep
18
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 18, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
17
2014
Histologics, LLC v. CDX Diagnostics, Inc. and Shared Medical Resources: Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00779 Faegre Drinker
Sep
17
2014
Dynamic Drinkware LLC v. National Graphics, Inc.: Final Written Decision Faegre Drinker
Sep
17
2014
Nissan North America, Inc. v. Norman IP Holdings, LLC: Order Denying Authorization for Motion to Stay IPR2014-00563 Faegre Drinker
Sep
17
2014
Samsung Electronics v. Rembrandt Wireless Technologies, LP, Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00514 Faegre Drinker
Sep
17
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 17, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
17
2014
Genetic Technologies v. LabCorp. – Mayo Redux Re: Patent Litigation Schwegman, Lundberg & Woessner, P.A.
Sep
16
2014
Google, Inc. v. Whitserve LLC: Final Written Decision IPR2013-00249 Faegre Drinker
Sep
16
2014
Dorman Products, Inc. v. PACCAR, Inc.: Petition Requesting Inter Partes Review of U.S. Design Patent Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
16
2014
Lenroc Company v. Enviro Tech Chemical Services, Inc., Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00382 Faegre Drinker
Sep
16
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 16, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
16
2014
Iron Dome LLC v. Chinook Licensing DE LLC: Denying Authorization to File a Motion for Sanctions IPR2014-00674 Faegre Drinker
Sep
16
2014
Trivascular, Inc. v. Shaun L. W. Samuels: Order Regarding Demonstrative Exhibits IPR2013-00493 Faegre Drinker
Sep
16
2014
The Thorny Problem of Patentable Eligible Subject Matter: Part 10 of a 10-Part Series: Japan Michael Best & Friedrich LLP
Sep
16
2014
Do PTAB Final Decisions Addressing a Portion of the Challenged Claims Create Work for Overburdened Courts? Armstrong Teasdale
Sep
15
2014
Dealersocket, Inc. v. Autoalert LLC: Order Dismissing Petitions CBM2014-00142, 147 Faegre Drinker
Sep
15
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 15, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
Sep
15
2014
A.C. Dispensing Equipment Inc. v. Prince Castle LLC: Denying Request for Rehearing IPR2014-00511 Faegre Drinker
Sep
15
2014
Neste Oil OYJ v. REG Synthetic Fuels, LLC: Decision Regarding Request for Sur-Reply IPR2013-00578 Faegre Drinker
Sep
14
2014
ARM Inc. v. Vantage Point Technology, Inc., Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00467 Faegre Drinker
Sep
13
2014
Mexichem Amanco Holdings v. Honeywell International, Denying Motion for Additional Discovery IPR2013-00576 Faegre Drinker
Sep
12
2014
Dorman Products, Inc. v. Paccar, Inc., Decision Denying Institution IPR2014-00542 Faegre Drinker
Sep
12
2014
Python Safety Files Trade Dress and Patent Infringement Complaint Against Ty-Flot Womble Bond Dickinson (US) LLP
Sep
12
2014
Macronix International v. Spansion LLC, Granting Motion to Seal IPR2014-00105 Faegre Drinker
Sep
12
2014
Ford Motor Company v. Paice LLC & The Abell Foundation, Inc.: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00568 Faegre Drinker
Sep
12
2014
GEA Process Engineering, Inc. v. Steuben Foods, Inc.: Order Regarding Page Limit Violations IPR2014-00041; IPR2014-00043; IPR2014-00051; IPR2014-00054; IPR2014-00055 Faegre Drinker
Sep
12
2014
Cisco Systems, Inc. v. C-Cation Tech., LLC: Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review IPR2014-00454 Faegre Drinker
Sep
12
2014
PTO Litigation Center Report – September 12, 2014 Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox P.L.L.C.
 

NLR Logo

We collaborate with the world's leading lawyers to deliver news tailored for you. Sign Up to receive our free e-Newsbulletins

 

Sign Up for e-NewsBulletins